CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Is the turbulence model really accurate,or it's just by chance?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 6, 2011, 08:39
Exclamation Is the turbulence model really accurate,or it's just by chance?
New Member
Kan Rui
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
keryfluid is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,
The turbulence model may get pretty good results for one case,compared to the experiment. But if we switch to a problem with similar flow mechanism, the same turbulence model may get quite bad results. I think some times the error just cancel with each other and we may get a 'good' simulation result by chance. The problem is, how to define if the model really works well or it just happens to work well?
As for simulation of complexed problem, the case available may be quite limited. Sometimes we may even just simulate a single case. In this case I find it really hard to judge which model behaves better with such little imformation. Is there any advice?
keryfluid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 12:45
New Member
Vertex Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
Kevin De Smet is on a distinguished road
While I don't have the answer to your question, it's very true that wrong answers do look like right answers, and that's more often than we'd like to think. Just with the mesh already you've got two primary mechanisms at work: mesh divergence and mesh dilution.

So you might have a concentration which makes a certain value jump really high but at the same time have the mesh to coarse so it spreads across a wider area. Both yank at the other, and you can have a seemingly valid answer. Dangerous stuff.
Kevin De Smet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 13:16
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 467
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Before one trusts a code or the implementation of a turbulence model, the code and model should be verified and validated. Something along the lines of

One should understand the flow physics being modeled, the turbulence model itself, and the experiment.

One should also run many simple cases and compare to what is out there to gain experience. Try to break the model, then back off to see where it works.

Yes, RANS codes can give bad results. It is just a model. But many bad results are also due to bad usage or bad practices.
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleFoam case with SpalartAllmaras turbulence model implemented nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 30, 2014 23:43
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model FelixL OpenFOAM Bugs 27 March 27, 2012 09:02
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model YJZ ANSYS 1 August 20, 2010 13:57
KOmega Turbulence model from wwwopenFOAMWikinet philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 August 4, 2010 10:26
SSG Reynolds Turbulence Model Georges CFX 1 February 28, 2007 17:15

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04.