CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Truck cfd analysis

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 1, 2011, 02:28
Default
  #21
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
sheth is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew.Coughtrie View Post
Thanks for all your help. I will be updating my results here. Rep added to u.

Do one need a licence copy of the ansys cfx to publish the paper of analysis?
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 1, 2011, 03:43
Default
  #22
New Member
 
Andrew Coughtrie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6
Andrew.Coughtrie is on a distinguished road
You always need either a Research License or a Commercial license if you're going to be doing anything that will be published. An academic teaching license should only be used for learning the software.
Andrew.Coughtrie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 11:38
Default
  #23
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
sheth is on a distinguished road
Ok. So I have done one experiment but it has about 25% error than the data i have to validate.

I have attached pic of mesh and analysis. I have question that how do I refine mesh? As you can see in image there is no vortex seen behind the truck so I think I need to do refinement near that region.

Last edited by sheth; February 24, 2012 at 12:14.
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 11:45
Default
  #24
New Member
 
Andrew Coughtrie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6
Andrew.Coughtrie is on a distinguished road
Can you post a pic of your mesh as well? Also what setting are you using in CFX, what turbulence model, boundary conditions etc?
Andrew.Coughtrie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 11:53
Default
  #25
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
sheth is on a distinguished road
Boundary conditions
At Inlet:
Velo x dir = 23.55 m/s
Velo y & z dir = 0 m/s
Turbulance: Intensity and length scale ; fractional int 0.05 m & eddy length scale 0.1 m
Temp : Static temp. (288 K)
At outlet:
Static pr. = Relative pr. : 0 pa
At the walls of domain (Including ground): Free slip wall
At the surface of truck & support: No slip wall

First two image show the meshing over the enclosure. Second shows meshing over truck body (Enclosure suppressed)

Last edited by sheth; February 24, 2012 at 12:14.
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 12:08
Default
  #26
New Member
 
Andrew Coughtrie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6
Andrew.Coughtrie is on a distinguished road
I sugest you try to produce a structured mesh with more refinement behind the truck where the features you're interested in are. you'll also need to do a mesh independence study. You should look up wake turbulence modelling and find out which turbulence models are most popular, you'll probably need to do a comparison between a few and your validation data.
Andrew.Coughtrie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 12:31
Default
  #27
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheth View Post
Ok. So I have done one experiment but it has about 25% error than the data i have to validate.

I have attached pic of mesh and analysis. I have question that how do I refine mesh? As you can see in image there is no vortex seen behind the truck so I think I need to do refinement near that region.
But there must be something there, regardless of the mesh sizing. It can not be a vacuum and I doubt the flow would wrap around the corner at the back. Did you place stream lines at the back?

Or do you mean there is no unsteady vortex shedding?
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 12:36
Default
  #28
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
sheth is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew.Coughtrie View Post
I sugest you try to produce a structured mesh with more refinement behind the truck where the features you're interested in are. you'll also need to do a mesh independence study. You should look up wake turbulence modelling and find out which turbulence models are most popular, you'll probably need to do a comparison between a few and your validation data.
So how exactly do I do structured meshing.

Here is how I do analysis.

1. In ansys workbench select CFX in analysis system table..
2. Import my truck design. & Made enclosure around it.
3. Did auto meshing.. (I think this is where I have to do something to make results accurate)

So in ansys meshing how do I create a proper structured grid? All I do is just do auto meshing.

4. Then i give input values.

I want to know which turbulence model did u chose?

5. Post processing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Hegedus View Post
But there must be something there, regardless of the mesh sizing. It can not be a vacuum and I doubt the flow would wrap around the corner at the back. Did you place stream lines at the back?

Or do you mean there is no unsteady vortex shedding?
I wanted to mean that flow doesnt curl around the rear bottom part.
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 13:42
Default
  #29
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheth View Post
I wanted to mean that flow doesnt curl around the rear bottom part.
Not sure that I understand. Since there are sharp edges around the parameter of the base, the flow will separate there. Depending on the turbulence model, you may get steady results. And this seems to be what you are getting. If the results are steady a ring vortex will exists at the back end. Are you seeing the ring vortex?

Or, are you expecting unsteady vortex shedding? Of course in real life that is what you will get. But, a turbulence model might not give you that. For example, in general, an ogive-cylinder body will give you a steady base flow using SA or SST turbulence model.
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2011, 10:15
Default
  #30
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
sheth is on a distinguished road
Can anyone please tell me how do I do structured meshing?
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do you do a fluent CFD analysis for a boat? UHMStudent FLUENT 2 July 24, 2011 12:45
CFD software capable of modal analysis? Jim-gineer Main CFD Forum 4 January 14, 2010 10:29
FDM vs FVM vs FEM in CFD analysis ck5285 FLOW-3D 1 September 1, 2009 10:51
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2000 10:07
CFD Analysis on Shock/Boundary Layer Interacton'-HELP Mujahid S. Suhaeb Main CFD Forum 8 December 1, 1999 18:14


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:20.