|
[Sponsors] |
May 18, 2005, 02:44 |
about MUSCL-Hancock?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi, all
I apply MUSCL-Hancock Method (MHM) with superbee slope limiter to conservation laws. I know how to use MHM, but i do not understand why MHM is of second order. Is it because the truncation error of Taylor's series expansion is of second order? I am confused because in my mind, the scheme is of first order if the error is of second order. One more question is how to prove the superbee slope limiter is total variation diminishing (TVD). Could some one give some hint? Thanks in advance. -Hao |
|
May 18, 2005, 05:04 |
Re: about MUSCL-Hancock?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have a look at andersons's book
-H |
|
May 24, 2005, 05:59 |
or Toro's book on
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
riemann solvers.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trouble when using MUSCL scheme on ONERA M6 wing | Aurélien | FLUENT | 2 | January 23, 2013 07:42 |
Help: Third-order MUSCL for flame propagation? | fireman | FLUENT | 3 | October 13, 2010 12:33 |
ROE Riemann Solver and MUSCL | ares | Main CFD Forum | 10 | May 7, 2010 04:47 |
extrapolation in MUSCL scheme | Chandra | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 14, 2007 11:21 |
Hancock MUSCL | marek | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 22, 2005 04:18 |