CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

meshfree cfd?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Saket.Chaudhary

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 26, 2011, 04:30
Default meshfree cfd?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 8
husker is on a distinguished road
Hi,

In the previous posts I read about XFLOW software.

I don't know or imagine how physical equations can be solved numerically without the finite element approach?

Could any expert write some about this method? How does it work, what are its advantages and disadvantages?
husker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 04:36
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 11
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Yes, would be nice if somebody in the know could tell us the basics...basics. advantages, disadvantages, efficiency, limitations...

no propaganda, just the plain facts.

would be very much appreciated!
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 05:41
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Saket.Chaudhary
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 5
Saket.Chaudhary is on a distinguished road
Guys,

I can tell you my experience and try not to sound like sales,
I have experience with multiple CFD software like CFD-ACE, CCM+, CFX, CFdesign etc used either in school or professional career both as a user and working for CFD companies.

The biggest time sink/pain was to get the geometry in the CFD software, Clean up(Either in a CFD software or if i am lucky in CAD software), then meshing ..... this represented 80% of the time in the simulation cycle. Exponential increase in computation power has led to simulations getting bigger and complex in size in today's world and while meshing technology are making good stides this still requires many man hours which are becoming more expensive than computer hardware.

You can probably see the advantages now
- No meshing, step completely eliminated
- Very lenient to dirt CAD ( intersections, duplicate surfaces etc)
- Complex motion problems ( no remeshing )
- Linearly scalable for parallel simulation

As with any new technology I am sure there would be some areas of improvement. We are everyday working with customers and running real life problems. The feedback has been tremendous right now....not hard to imagine that the first reaction is WOW and then they want to see their own problem in XFlow. With the real life problems we running everyday the performance has been exceptional in terms of time savings for customers, speed, accuracy.

@ Husker: Obviously I can share the technical details but if you can Google it you will see the amount of research on this with Messless and LES really the next step in CFD.

if you guys want to have a deep dive into XFlow send me a note saket.chaudhary@mscsoftware.com
fluidmechanics likes this.
Saket.Chaudhary is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 05:50
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 11
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Saket,
thank you for your comments. I agree that pre-processing can take up a large amount of your computational time, but it also offers a huge chance of getting to the "right" result. I guess we both agree that a bad mesh can lead to very wrong results, if you are way off, even grid refinement won't tell you sth is wrong.

So here's my question:
On what physical/mathematical principle is your code based? Surely you must ensure some kind of conservation?

Secondly, efficiency and speed is not all in CFD.... how does your code compare in terms of accuracy per DOF? There must be some research papers your work is based on in journals like JCP or such... could you point us to them?

thank you!
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 06:08
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 8
husker is on a distinguished road
Thank you Saket.

I will be reading about this subject through academical papers. This topic is very interesting to me while it has some basic differences. However, I actually feel shamed because of lack of my knowledge about this technique.
husker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 27, 2012, 14:34
Default
  #6
New Member
 
AP
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
gama is on a distinguished road
Has anybody found the physical/mathematical principles and the CFD formulation of the XFLOW yet? (I am interested in a deeper level than what XFLOW can do or what is its advantages). Can you post a link to a paper or documentation which talks about XFLOW formulation?
gama is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 27, 2012, 14:41
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Saket.Chaudhary
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 5
Saket.Chaudhary is on a distinguished road
@ Gama. Send me an e-mail at saket.chaudhary@mscsoftware.com.
Saket.Chaudhary is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 27, 2012, 15:40
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 11
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gama View Post
Has anybody found the physical/mathematical principles and the CFD formulation of the XFLOW yet? (I am interested in a deeper level than what XFLOW can do or what is its advantages). Can you post a link to a paper or documentation which talks about XFLOW formulation?

no, sadly, that's kind of under wraps or by invitation only... would be interested in the scientific basis as well! sounds too good to be true, and the videos they posted are very impressive. Just let us look under the hood
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2013, 12:49
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Jing
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 5
Jing_min is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saket.Chaudhary View Post
Guys,

I can tell you my experience and try not to sound like sales,
I have experience with multiple CFD software like CFD-ACE, CCM+, CFX, CFdesign etc used either in school or professional career both as a user and working for CFD companies.

The biggest time sink/pain was to get the geometry in the CFD software, Clean up(Either in a CFD software or if i am lucky in CAD software), then meshing ..... this represented 80% of the time in the simulation cycle. Exponential increase in computation power has led to simulations getting bigger and complex in size in today's world and while meshing technology are making good stides this still requires many man hours which are becoming more expensive than computer hardware.

You can probably see the advantages now
- No meshing, step completely eliminated
- Very lenient to dirt CAD ( intersections, duplicate surfaces etc)
- Complex motion problems ( no remeshing )
- Linearly scalable for parallel simulation

As with any new technology I am sure there would be some areas of improvement. We are everyday working with customers and running real life problems. The feedback has been tremendous right now....not hard to imagine that the first reaction is WOW and then they want to see their own problem in XFlow. With the real life problems we running everyday the performance has been exceptional in terms of time savings for customers, speed, accuracy.

@ Husker: Obviously I can share the technical details but if you can Google it you will see the amount of research on this with Messless and LES really the next step in CFD.

if you guys want to have a deep dive into XFlow send me a note saket.chaudhary@mscsoftware.com

Hi
What are the advatages of LBM over SPH?
Can you compare them?
Jing_min is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 0 February 13, 2002 13:23
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Since Last June John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 3 July 12, 1999 09:38
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50.