- **Main CFD Forum**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/*)

- - **Total time for simulation**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/92177-total-time-simulation.html*)

Total time for simulationHello,
I am running a hydrodyamics simulation that is using a 3rd order TVD Runge-Kutta time stepping method along with appropriate 3rd order reconstruction routines to calculate primitive variables at cell boundaries for use in a variety of Riemann solvers to calculate the fluxes. However, my question is quite simple: After each completed loop of the three steps in the RK algorithm, is the total amount of time elapsed increased by a single time step, three time steps or a third of the time step? I have tried to compare my results against test problems in the literature and while I can reproduce the solution it is usually at the wrong time. I am just not sure how to control the time step in the calculation of the overall time elapsed. Everything else is working fine!:p Thoughts anyone? |

Hello Meerkat, this link might help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...d-order_method note that the step (timestep) here is h, and the coefficients are the b's....So in the three step method, your bs are 1/6, 2/3, 1/6 (note they add up to 1!). This means that if you have applied your method correctly, the solution is advanced by h (in space or time). Might I suggest that you turn to the explicit Euler: du/dt = (u(n+1)-u(n))/delta t... that's the easiest and most simple, I'm quite sure there won't be stability issues with an O(3) method.... So pick the Euler, and try a simple testcase, i.e. a density bubble transported by a constant flow velocity.... thereby, you know the physical speed of the problem and can debug your code! cheers! |

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:37. |