|September 5, 2011, 06:48||
Total time for simulation
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1Rep Power: 0
I am running a hydrodyamics simulation that is using a 3rd order TVD Runge-Kutta time stepping method along with appropriate 3rd order reconstruction routines to calculate primitive variables at cell boundaries for use in a variety of Riemann solvers to calculate the fluxes. However, my question is quite simple:
After each completed loop of the three steps in the RK algorithm, is the total amount of time elapsed increased by a single time step, three time steps or a third of the time step?
I have tried to compare my results against test problems in the literature and while I can reproduce the solution it is usually at the wrong time. I am just not sure how to control the time step in the calculation of the overall time elapsed. Everything else is working fine!
|September 5, 2011, 07:17||
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551Rep Power: 11
Hello Meerkat, this link might help you:
note that the step (timestep) here is h, and the coefficients are the b's....So in the three step method, your bs are 1/6, 2/3, 1/6 (note they add up to 1!). This means that if you have applied your method correctly, the solution is advanced by h (in space or time).
Might I suggest that you turn to the explicit Euler: du/dt = (u(n+1)-u(n))/delta t... that's the easiest and most simple, I'm quite sure there won't be stability issues with an O(3) method....
So pick the Euler, and try a simple testcase, i.e. a density bubble transported by a constant flow velocity.... thereby, you know the physical speed of the problem and can debug your code!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Hydrostatic Pressure and Gravity||miliante||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||132||October 7, 2012 22:50|
|Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3||bookie56||OpenFOAM Installation||8||August 13, 2011 04:03|
|VOF||özgür||FLUENT||8||January 6, 2004 09:23|
|Physical Reason for stability of Implicit Schemes?||radhakrishnan||Main CFD Forum||25||December 7, 2000 16:25|
|unsteady calcs in FLUENT||Sanjay Padhiar||Main CFD Forum||1||March 31, 1999 12:32|