CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

k-omega for flow separation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 28, 2011, 13:43
Default k-omega for flow separation
  #1
New Member
 
mike
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
mike.mm is on a distinguished road
dear all,

i am estimating pressure drop for flow across multiple cylinders with their axis perpendicular to flow direction. the pressure drop estimated by using standard k-epsilon model is deviating experimental value. After which i have used standard k-omega model and now pressure drop is matching closely with experimental value. how k-omega model is giving accurate estimate for pressure drop estimate for flow separation across cylinder ?
thanks in advance.
mike.mm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 28, 2011, 17:28
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 8
artemiss1984 is on a distinguished road
Hi.

dear friend the k-w model employes integration to viscous layer without any damping function rather low Re k-epsilon model.I dont know about your k-epsilin simulation but generally the k-w model is better in prediction of separated flows.
in your problem the dominant effect is pressure drag which is (probably) obtained better with k-w model.
for more details about the modeling I suggest the turbulence modelling for cfd by wilcox.
artemiss1984 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 30, 2011, 13:38
Default
  #3
New Member
 
mike
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6
mike.mm is on a distinguished road
Thank u very much for u reply. Dear friend, today i have read paper by Wilcox [ URL ="http://www.scribd.com/doc/ 47919871/1988-Wilcox-AIAAJ-k-omega"]. I could not understand much but whatever i understood i have presenting here so that it will be beneficial for us.

paper says that Wilcox has done defect layer analysis using perturbation method for k-omega and k-epsilon models. he applied solution from perturbation method to adverse pressure gradient condition. He found that omega equation is better formulation in adverse pressure gradient and in k-epsilon model (equation 25), epsilon equation neglects some terms which significant for adverse pressure gradient condition. because of which over estimation turbulence length scale occurs. the model constants sigma and sigma* are chosen such that model accurately predicts flow separation. but i did not find that integration to viscous layer is responsible for better prediction.

If u can understand it better then please let me know u r thoughts.
mike.mm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 3, 2011, 16:05
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 8
artemiss1984 is on a distinguished road
yes.it is correct.
try to obtain wilcox turbulence modeling for cfd.you will find your answer
artemiss1984 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wall function and flow separation O.D.Y. FLUENT 1 October 3, 2011 16:27
overshooting of Omega in SST komega using simpleFoam cm_jubayer OpenFOAM 1 August 26, 2011 13:18
Boundary Conditions for k omega SST dancfd OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 June 9, 2011 23:25
Use of k omega turbulence model john_w OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 September 22, 2009 05:15
Wall function implementation K Omega SSt cbarry OpenFOAM 3 August 18, 2009 10:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23.