CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Grid types and change of angle of attack

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 9, 2011, 07:10
Default Grid types and change of angle of attack
  #1
New Member
 
Corrado
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
cpinz is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I wonder if C-grid or O grids are the only solution for analyzing airfoils under change of angle of attack without rotate the airfoil itself ( that is without rotate the geometry and re-meshing again).

Is the same task possible with standard rectangular domains ( where I have velocity inlet, pressure outlet and symmetry up and bottom as boundary conditions ) ?

Thank you
cpinz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2011, 09:31
Default
  #2
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,914
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
yes you can
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2011, 12:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Corrado
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
cpinz is on a distinguished road
Hi Far ,

thank you for your reply.
Do you mean that it is sufficient to input the components (u,v) of inlet velocity , keeping other boundary conditions unchanged ? Or have I to change the type of some boundary condition ?

For high angles of attack , the fact that v component of velocity has a steep angle respect to the (vertical) inlet of a rectangular domain, doesn't affect the analysis ?

Thanks
cpinz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2011, 14:51
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 235
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 8
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
I would rather use velocity inlet bc on top and bottom too. You can change inlet velocity rather than mesh, no problems. Just make sure that near-field wake does not go to low-resolution mesh region under high aoa.
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2011, 17:51
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Corrado
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
cpinz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by truffaldino View Post
I would rather use velocity inlet bc on top and bottom too. You can change inlet velocity rather than mesh, no problems. Just make sure that near-field wake does not go to low-resolution mesh region under high aoa.
Are you saying that the boundary condition would be (supposing flow coming from left):
left side, bottom,top= velocity inlet
right side = pressure outlet ?
cpinz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 10, 2011, 09:57
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 235
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 8
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpinz View Post
Are you saying that the boundary condition would be (supposing flow coming from left):
left side, bottom,top= velocity inlet
right side = pressure outlet ?
Yes, exactly. If your top and bottom are far enough from the airfoil it does not really matter if they are velocity inlet or periodic. I usually take about 12 chord distances from airfoil to the top/bottom with velocity inlet on 3 sides and pressure outlet at the right side and it works just fine.

If your angle of attack is really huge, i.e. a such that wake goes to the top side, rather than into the outlet, you could change role of the sides and put outlet on the top and velocity inlet on the right, but I think the latter is not your case.

Hope it helps
Truffaldino
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 10, 2011, 11:56
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Corrado
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
cpinz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by truffaldino View Post
Yes, exactly. If your top and bottom are far enough from the airfoil it does not really matter if they are velocity inlet or periodic. I usually take about 12 chord distances from airfoil to the top/bottom with velocity inlet on 3 sides and pressure outlet at the right side and it works just fine.

If your angle of attack is really huge, i.e. a such that wake goes to the top side, rather than into the outlet, you could change role of the sides and put outlet on the top and velocity inlet on the right, but I think the latter is not your case.

Hope it helps
Truffaldino

Thank you very much for your helpful posts
cpinz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
change cell types RX CD-adapco 9 November 30, 2006 08:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44.