CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   LES filtering (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/9346-les-filtering.html)

andy June 17, 2005 10:54

LES filtering
 
We can decompose f into its filtered part [f] and subgrid part f":

f = [f] + f" ------------------ 1

If we interpret [f] as the total-field filtered, can we then re-decompose it for a second time, i.e:

f = [ [f] + f" ] + f" ------------------ 2

which is the same as:

f = [ [f] ] + [f"] + f" ------------------ 3

Can some one please tell me if we can do this?

Is equation 1 = equation 3?

i.e. is [f] + f" = [ [f] ] + [f"] + f" for all types of filter?

Thanks.

agg June 17, 2005 11:25

Re: LES filtering
 
Yes, you can do that. In fact it is the base for scale similar models and I do not think it depends on the type of filter.

Salvador June 17, 2005 11:42

Re: LES filtering
 
Yes but this decomposition doesn't help much. [f"] is NOT 0 so you do not go very far. Using spectral filters [f"]=0 and then [[f]]=[f] Check Pope's book on turbulent flows

andy June 17, 2005 11:48

Re: LES filtering
 
You will have to say more about the properties of your filters. If [f"] = 0 and [[f]] = [f] then yes but this is trivial. Usually a second filter is different to the first and, hence, the subgrid components are different.

noName June 17, 2005 15:09

Re: LES filtering
 
Your derivation is correct and [f] + f" = [ [f] ] + [f"] + f" is valid for all types of filters. The only thing you assumed is that the filter kernel is distributive, i.e. [ [f] + f'' ] = [ [f] ] + [f''].

In fact the filtering convolution integral is associative, commutative and distributive ... so the algebra is simple.

andy June 17, 2005 19:55

Re: LES filtering
 
thanks guys this has been helpful.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01.