CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Contradictory Results from different software

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 19, 2011, 14:20
Default Contradictory Results from different software
  #1
New Member
 
Niall
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
Yogibear is on a distinguished road
If ive put this in the wrong place ill apologise wasent sure where it should go.

Over the past 3 years ive done a lot of work with Star CCM+ whilst at University doing reasearch into racing car wings.

Ive recently started trying to use Solidworks Flo-simlation to get results as well is producing the designs and to to a degree validate my previous reasearch. I have set the simulations up identically but am getting very different results , in the region of 50% difference between the results from Star CCM and Flo-Simulation.

Feedback from other students is that Flo-simulation isnt as good as Star CCM but im strugling to believe that the results can be that different. If anyone could offer some advice it would be appreciated.
Yogibear is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 10:17
Default
  #2
New Member
 
FlowLy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 6
giuli@ is on a distinguished road
...same number of cells?? same wall resolution?? same wall function?? same turbulence model?? same numerical scheme/order of accuracy??
giuli@ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 18:41
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 5
ChunkyPastaSauce is on a distinguished road
You should have some experimental data to check your results. Without it youre unlikely to know if you're getting correct results (even if the two packages get the same results). Optimally the data should come from your specific item you are doing analysis on. If that cant be had then search papers where someone has done something similar, simulate that and check to see if the results a reasonable. If so, proceed with your geometry.

Last edited by ChunkyPastaSauce; October 21, 2011 at 18:10. Reason: spl
ChunkyPastaSauce is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2011, 05:58
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Vertex Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
Kevin De Smet is on a distinguished road
Yeah, it's always the easiest thing to say "flo isn't as good as star" that isn't an answer, it's a statement. While true it may be that star calculated additional physics that flo doesn't and that it is important for your analysis, you should first check to check all of giuli's remarks.
Kevin De Smet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2011, 09:28
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Niall
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
Yogibear is on a distinguished road
The experiments ive undertaken are very simple , a NACA 0012 wing in a wind tunnel with the same velocity and angle of attack. Ive used this as ive allready done a lot of work in this area and have verified results from using star ccm. The results matched publiished results very closly and the generated CL and CD were almost perfect.

Ive run the same experiment in flow-works and the results are wrong and are quite obviously wrong from looking at the visualisations its quite clear to see.

Pressure Star CCM+

Pressure Solidoworks Flo-works

Velocity Star CCM+

Velocity Solidoworks Flo-works
Yogibear is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2011, 12:22
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Vertex Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
Kevin De Smet is on a distinguished road
RANS codes don't handle these kinds of problems well, Floworks is a RANS turbulence solver only. It has problems especially where the re-attachment zone is.
Kevin De Smet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2011, 18:32
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Niall
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
Yogibear is on a distinguished road
OK, im guessing Flow-works isnt the one to use for this kind of analysis then.

Is their anything that can be done to improve it or is it simply the case of using different software.
Yogibear is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2011, 03:44
Default
  #8
New Member
 
FlowLy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 6
giuli@ is on a distinguished road
I think RANS modelling is good enough for 2D airfoils, and different solvers should give very similar results.
Did you consider the questions I was asking above? I think the answer of your problem is there..
Just a suggestion, if you want to compare results, use the same scale-range.

Try openfoam, it is for free and it makes you be aware of the conditions you put

giuli@
giuli@ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2011, 09:55
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Niall
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
Yogibear is on a distinguished road
Thanks, I am wanting to try open foam but im waiting for a second PC to run it on as I dont want dual operating systems on my workstation.

When I had set up the run I had tried to match all of the conditions that I could between both software's but was unable to find corresponding options for everything in flow-works. Was wondering if their were some hidden advanced menu's in their or what you see is what you get.

Simply wante to increse my work throughput as I can do things in flow-works far faster than in ctar-ccm so if the results were going to tally was going to use flow-works.
Yogibear is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2011, 13:53
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Vertex Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
Kevin De Smet is on a distinguished road
Flo is good really, it's just very dependent on the problem. Unfortunately many times problems are not easy to identify unless you have previous knowledge into the kind of models you are simulating.
Kevin De Smet is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Generate a CFD domain from FEA results Dave442 Main CFD Forum 0 August 3, 2011 12:42
Results comparison problems ken87 FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 0 March 15, 2011 04:58
Water mist modelling capabilities of any software. Iqbal Main CFD Forum 4 January 17, 2011 02:15
Exporting Fluent results as 4D images in an interactive window Luca95314 ANSYS 0 October 11, 2010 17:16
Requesting help for validating software HectorRedal Main CFD Forum 4 September 4, 2010 10:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:28.