|October 23, 2011, 09:49||
Low Reynolds Airfoil Modeling In Fluent
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Iran,Islamic Republic of
Posts: 159Rep Power: 7
Hi. I am modeling anderson Spica airfoil in fluent.
the maximum velocity is 40m/s.
the Grid is CH
what is the best boundary condition for inlet outlet and upper and lower boundary.
which solver can predict the cl and cd more accurate.
what about under-relaxation factors? discretization methods and pressure velocity coupling?
I did not get good result by my own settings.
the residuals remain in high value. and cl and cd oscillate.
|October 24, 2011, 06:03||
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18Rep Power: 6
I would put Pressure Far Field for all the boundaries.
kw-SST usually is the most accurate; but for airfoil you can use Spalart-Allmaras, is computationally cheaper than kw-SST and was developed especially for this application.
Under-relax factors: keep the default; if you have problem with convergence it can help if you lower them. But usually, if it does not converge, there must be a problem either in the formulation of the problem (BC) or in the mesh, or in the geometry..
Hope this help
|November 23, 2011, 05:40||
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 36Rep Power: 7
You have to watch out for transition, as none of the RANS models accurately captures it. Therefore your Cd maybe higher than results obtained in the literature. XFOIL should also help.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Low Reynolds Modeling||Mo-ITB||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||0||June 16, 2010 03:10|
|Low Reynolds Modeling Lam Bremhorst||Mo-ITB||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||April 15, 2010 05:52|
|Flapping Airfoil Simulation in Low Reynolds Number Flow||M.Sc_Student||Main CFD Forum||0||April 6, 2010 09:30|
|Fluent 12.0, Low Reynolds Number Flows||anandvksin2003||FLUENT||1||January 26, 2010 06:16|
|Modeling Backflow for a 3D Airfoil (Wing of Finite Span)||Josh||CFX||9||August 18, 2009 11:31|