# Oscillating airfoil problem

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 25, 2005, 03:25 Oscillating airfoil problem #1 ganesh Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Friends, I am working on an oscillating airfoil problem at present and I have a few doubts in this regards. I am trying to solve AGARD CT5 test case which is inviscid flow past harmonically oscillating NACA0012 airfoil. The variation of AOA is given as alpha(t) = alp_mean + alpha_o*sin(wt) where alp_mean = 0.016deg, alpha_o= 2.51 deg. Instead of w, what is reported commonly is the reduced frequency, k = w*chord/ 2*U_infty. For this case at hand, k = 0.0814. The NACA airfoil has a chord of unity and my freestream Mach is 0.755. Since I need my w for calculations, I need U_infty. I plan to calculate U_infty as U_infty = Mach * a_infty My question is what reference temperature must be used to calculate a_infty ? And what would be the corressponding w ? I calculated w as around 41 rad/s, but my results show reasonable disagreement with experiments, eventhough the 'hysterisis oval' I am supposed to get is seen in my computations. Can anyone in this field give me a reply, I have been stuck for nearly two weeks on this problem Thanks in advance, Ganesh

 June 27, 2005, 08:32 Re: Oscillating airfoil problem #2 asue Guest   Posts: n/a hi, Actually, the temperature doesn't matter much as long as it is around experimental temperature condition (say 20 degree). you have no problem to calculate U-infty by using U_infty = Mach * a_infty. Once you have U_infty, you can easily work out w(Omiga). The most important issue is that you should define your k consistent with that in the experiment. Some studies use k = w*chord/ 2*U_infty and other use k = w*chord/U_infty. So check with the expemental document to make sure you have used the same difinition.

 June 27, 2005, 13:57 Re: Oscillating airfoil problem #3 ganesh Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Asue, Thanks for your reply. I did use a temperature of around 25 C and calculated w. I have checked out k and its definition is consistent with the experiment. I think my code has a bug somewhere else, not possibly on this account. Thankyou for your suggestion. Regards, Ganesh

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Farid CFX 3 March 29, 2012 05:52 mike wilson CFX 12 August 3, 2010 11:06 creggie ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 10 June 27, 2010 19:24 thanos FLUENT 4 February 14, 2010 08:26 AirWolf STAR-CCM+ 5 January 12, 2010 00:37

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:06.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top