Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Is J. Blazek's 2d unstructed code capable of computing fluid mach > 10 ?

Updated Threads

Reply

Search this Thread

November 4, 2011, 22:24	Is J. Blazek's 2d unstructed code capable of computing fluid mach > 10 ?	#1
gchnhn New Member Guo Qinghua Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Nanjing Posts: 10 Rep Power: 14	All the validation examples given is subsonic or transonic. He uses Roe flux, and a limiter(I forget which types limiter). I tried the naca0012, it is normal when machinf=1, but when i set machinf=2, the program fails to run. Is Roe flux competent for supersonic flow theoretically? Or I need to change some other conditions to make it work?

Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Water subcooled boiling	Attesz	CFX	7	January 5, 2013 03:32
Has anyone a detailed description of J Blazek's unstructed 2D code?	gchnhn	Main CFD Forum	0	November 3, 2011 04:38
non-dimensional analysis in Fluent	Endee	FLUENT	8	September 7, 2005 16:16
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History	Abhi	Main CFD Forum	12	July 8, 2002 09:11
Design Integration with CFD?	John C. Chien	Main CFD Forum	19	May 17, 2001 15:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:34.