CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Linearization of viscous flux in discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 17, 2011, 12:28
Question Linearization of viscous flux in discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods
  #1
New Member
 
Yidong
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 5
yidongxia is on a distinguished road
I'm a student studying discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element methods in CFD.

Many papers related to implicit DG methods for Navier-Stokes equations claim that the linearization of viscous flux (viscous Jacobian matrix) is computed analytically, but provide no more details.

In finite volume methods, it's not necessary to compute the viscous Jacobian matrix explicitly. A common simplification is to use the spectral radius instead of analytically derived viscous Jacobian matrix. However for DG methods, I haven't seen any papers addressing the derivation of viscous Jacobians explicitly. So far as my own experience can tell, if the linearization of viscous flux is not treated carefully, the implicit solver will not work.

If it happens that you are familiar with DG methods, I'll appreciate so much if you would share your experience and discuss with me
yidongxia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2011, 13:11
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
praveen's Avatar
 
Praveen. C
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 251
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 9
praveen is on a distinguished road
If you treat any coefficients in the viscous terms as constants, then the viscous terms are linear, e.g., \frac{d}{dx}\mu \frac{du}{dx}, consider \mu to be constant for derivation of implicit scheme. Assembling such terms will give you A*U where A is a matrix and U is the vector of unknown solution. The linearization of this is just A*dU. At the analytical level, you have a bilinear for a(u,v) representing the viscous terms. Its linearlization is just a(du, v) whose assembled version is A*dU.
praveen is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
implicit method, navier stokes equations

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finite Element vs Cartesian Grip methods Sidi Main CFD Forum 0 December 15, 2005 11:40
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 18:28
Finite Difference, Element & Volume methods JonS Main CFD Forum 10 July 18, 2004 05:35
Discontinuous Galerkin finite element method Tony Main CFD Forum 0 May 27, 2003 18:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06.