CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Near compressible fluid - denstiy-based solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 15, 2011, 12:22
Red face Near compressible fluid - denstiy-based solver
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7
Hooman is on a distinguished road
Hi,
My problem involves the numerical analysis of a fluid (liquid) with low compressibility. I have varied the density through out my formulations. From how my equations were formed (with the variable density) I naturally used a denistiy-based solver. However I have just realized that for near compressible flows (low Mach number) a pressure-based solver is more efficient. I have found a few references as well. However my problem is also isothermal. I was wondering if anyone knew of any references where an isothermal near compressible flow is being solved using a density-based solver. Also if you knew any example of situations where this might occur, please let me know.
Regards,
Hooman
Hooman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 2011, 12:56
Default
  #2
Member
 
Zachariah Swetky
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5
swetkyz is on a distinguished road
Hooman,

If your fluid is only slightly compressible, a pressure based solver will still be applicable. You may also be able to solve the flow as incompressible since your fluid is a liquid and it is at a low speed.
swetkyz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 2011, 16:08
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7
Hooman is on a distinguished road
yeah I know that. I was wondering if you knew of any isothermal examples?
Hooman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2011, 23:37
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Wouldn't the equation of state for the liquid state that if you have constant density and temperature, then the pressure would also be constant?
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2011, 11:59
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7
Hooman is on a distinguished road
I'm using a density-based method, so the density varies.
Hooman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2011, 14:48
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Hi Hooman

Just to be clear, your flow is low speed isothermal. I'm not sure of the equation of state of your liquid, but I'm going to assume that it has the same form as the ideal gas law, i.e. p=k*rho*T. If this is the case, then p/p_inf=rho/rho_inf. As the Mach number decreases, and your pressure and density flucuations decrease, your system becomes stiff. This is a bigger issue with the right hand side than, I believe, how one solves it. Yes, solving a low Mach number problem may take more time. That's an issue with the solver. Unfortunately, the answer you converge on could be bad. That's an issue with the right hand side. Two things you can do. First, use Mach number preconditioning. Or, if your range of Mach numbers is small, increase your Mach number slightly. A Mach number of 0.001 and 0.01 or even 0.1 should produce similar answers, as long as the max Mach number in the field remains below 0.3 to 0.4.

I'm not aware of any isothermal examples. This is not to say they don't exist. It's just not my area of experience.
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2011, 15:16
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 7
Hooman is on a distinguished road
Thanks very much Martin.
Hooman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2011, 21:04
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Oh, when I said things would be similar, I meant cp and V/V_inf. Sorry. To get your true pressure, you'll need to take the cp value and multiply it by your true velocity, not the scaled up velocity resulting from the scaled up Mach number. To get your true density you'll need to use your equation of state. Of course I don't know your exact problem, so be careful with this idea of scaling up Mach number.
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2011, 04:03
Default
  #9
Member
 
vicarious's Avatar
 
Pedram Mojtabavi
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 6
vicarious is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to vicarious
Dear Hooman,
if you are solving a low Mach number flow ( approximately lower than 0.3) you better consider incompressible and use pressure based solver, becuase the density based is not a high speed solver and one of the important issue caused by density based is the convergency, it means that your residuals may not drop and oscillate constantly.
I hope this would help. and by the way where are you from?
best regards.
vicarious is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure based and Density based Solver Xobile Main CFD Forum 18 April 13, 2015 07:49
Using pressure based solver for compressible flows aamer Main CFD Forum 2 June 15, 2011 12:45
Problem Interface Solid Fluid with wall velocity Solver v12 hills1 CFX 2 October 12, 2009 05:36
pressure based solver fadhil FLUENT 2 May 28, 2008 06:29
interfacing a fluid solver with abaqus Tuhin Rakshit Main CFD Forum 0 June 16, 2005 10:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19.