# grid size for DNS

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 21, 2005, 15:10 grid size for DNS #1 dirk Guest   Posts: n/a Hello, I did some calculations with RANS models of a jet in cross flow. Now I am thinking about how fine the mesh for a DNS should be. I have a jet Reynolds number based on jet velocity and hole diameter (=8mm) of about 4600 and the momentum loss thickness Reynolds number of the mainstream just upstream the jet is around 370. So firstly: which one is decisive for determining the grid size for a DNS (I suppose it is the first one) and secondly: how small will it be ? Thanks in advance, Dirk

 July 21, 2005, 21:02 Re: grid size for DNS #2 yuan Guest   Posts: n/a Estimate the Komogorov scale, say l, then use dx=(5~20)l. maybe the you need N=100~200 crossflow!

 July 21, 2005, 21:38 Re: grid size for DNS #3 hhb8622078 Guest   Posts: n/a

 July 25, 2005, 14:43 kolmogorov scales #4 dirk Guest   Posts: n/a Hello, I found these formulas for estimating kolmogorov scales: length=(nu^3/eps)^0.25 and time=(nu/eps)^0.5 . Are these correct ? My minimum kolmogorov length from realizable k-eps computation is 0.04mm. I think, the grid size in these regions must not be bigger than this.

 July 25, 2005, 15:42 Re: kolmogorov scales #5 noName Guest   Posts: n/a Yes, the formulae are correct. In general, it is hard to accurately estimate the Kolmogorov scale from a simulation (using say k, epsilon and nu). It's best to use some experimental data for this. That being said, a true DNS should be able to resolve the Kolmogorov-scale wavenumber, so you need a resolution of at least half the Kolmogorov scale. However, this is usually computationally very expensive, so published DNSs usually resolve only about 6 times the Kolmogorov scale. Pope's book on Turbulence, explains why this is a reasonable grid size.

 July 27, 2005, 04:02 Re: kolmogorov scales #6 yuan Guest   Posts: n/a You may read Moin%Mahesh,1998. Ann Rev Fluid Mech,30,p539 for a practical estimate. The practical DNS is not so loyal to the resolution rule, i.e. a coarser mesh is adopted, or your mesh is too fine to work.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post piprus OpenFOAM Installation 22 February 25, 2010 14:43 jay CD-adapco 6 September 5, 2008 05:00 panara OpenFOAM 2 February 20, 2008 15:37 kcg CD-adapco 5 April 8, 2007 18:26 versi Main CFD Forum 4 February 16, 2004 07:42

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54.