CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Convergence for axisymmetric flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 5, 2005, 01:48
Default Convergence for axisymmetric flow
  #1
bl201
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi everyone,

Question about axisymmetric flow: I'm using a 2-D planar flow solver that I want to modify to handle axisymmetric geomerty.

I've derived the NS equations in cylindrical coordinates, and coded the source terms (implicitly), but the solver does not converge anymore. Running 1st or 2nd order, inviscid or viscous, nothing can make it to converge.

Actually it does converge for a static-to-stagnation pressure ratio of .35, which is not very interesting as the flow separate right after the throat of the nozzle. No run with a lower pressure ratio converged.

Any solution to improve convergence ?

bl201

ps: I'm quite a beginner in CFD and on this forum; thanks for your help...
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2005, 03:33
Default Re: Convergence for axisymmetric flow
  #2
upwind
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Assuming that you have no bugs in your code, a likely reason for encountering problems with axisymmetric geometries as compared to their equivalent 2-d counterparts is that the flow variations are much larger in former as compared to latter so the inherent dissipation in your numerical scheme will trigger separation even in an inviscid flow which is physically incorrect. You need to increase grid points downstream of the throat substantially in both directions to avoid this numerical artifact and hopefully your code will converge. Keep increasing number of points until your inviscid solver does not yield a separated flow solution then add more points near the wall for capturing boundary layer for viscous computations in a given geometry.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2005, 03:08
Default Re: Convergence for axisymmetric flow
  #3
Rami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Check carefully the treatment of your BC, mainly for r=0. If you use FDM, this may cause difficulty, and special techniques were developed to overcome it. In the FVM this is not an issue, since the flux there is multiplied by a zero area.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2005, 21:34
Default Re: Convergence for axisymmetric flow
  #4
bl201
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your ideas.

Could tell me a bit more about these special techniques for r=0 BC ?
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2005, 02:11
Default Re: Convergence for axisymmetric flow
  #5
Rami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A recent paper on this subject is

G. S. Constantinescu and S. K. Lele, A Highly Accurate Technique for the Treatment of Flow Equations at the Polar Axis in Cylindrical Coordinates Using Series Expansions, Journal of Computational Physics 183, 165186 (2002).

I prefer, however, the weak forms (i.e., FVM and FEM), where - as mentioned in my former posting - this is not an issue at all.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2005, 17:01
Default Re: Convergence for axisymmetric flow
  #6
bl201
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Actually, I'm using Finite-Volume method...

I can run 1st order, results are good (for 1st order, that is), but 2nd order blows up
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Force can not converge colopolo CFX 13 October 4, 2011 22:03
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis nasdak CFX 2 June 29, 2009 01:17
mass flow convergence on interfaces Tatiana STAR-CCM+ 0 June 25, 2009 03:19
convergence problem of three phase flow nick CFX 3 April 25, 2008 09:00
Help - Two Phase Flow - Convergence Problem R.Sureshkumar Main CFD Forum 1 February 22, 2000 04:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:46.