# Why implicit solvers are stable at more cfl no

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 12, 2005, 15:33 Why implicit solvers are stable at more cfl no #1 endee Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I just was wondering what makes implicit solvers more stable as compared with explicit ones in terms of CFL number.. Cheers endee

 August 12, 2005, 19:10 Re: Why implicit solvers are stable at more cfl no #2 Mani Guest   Posts: n/a This can be answered on so many levels, but it's such a basic question that almost any textbook on CFD will give you an answer. The CFL condition basically states that within any explicit time step, flow information is not allowed to propagate farther than from one grid point to the adjacent grid point. Given a grid and flow, this condition provides a maximum limit for the time step. The exact stability condition will depend on the numerical scheme, and for linear equations you can find it by a von Neumann stability analysis as described in your textbook. The same stability analysis on implicit schemes will reveal that they are more stable (even unconditionally stable). You could argue that the reason is given by the implicit connection of all grid points in such schemes. In explicit schemes only the immediate neighbors (within the stencil) exchange information within each time step. Hence the CFL condition. With implicit schemes, the connectivity ideally reaches through the entire grid.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post djbungee OpenFOAM Programming & Development 45 March 23, 2015 05:14 harish_0689@ Main CFD Forum 0 September 18, 2011 13:09 jk75 FLOW-3D 2 May 29, 2010 03:35 turb Main CFD Forum 4 August 16, 2005 12:56 D.T. Main CFD Forum 2 October 23, 2002 13:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59.