CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Refrences about transient flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree7Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 14, 2012, 08:32
Red face Refrences about transient flow
  #1
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
Hi to everyOne

Can anybody introduce me some good refrences about simulation of transient flows?

TNX very Much
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 15:08
Unhappy
  #2
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
No any answer?
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 16:38
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 11
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by amin144 View Post
No any answer?

I guess your request is just too wide/general, there's so much literature about that out there, I guess it would be easier to help if you were more specific!
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:01
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
if you need a test-case, it exists an analytical benchmark of a 3d incompressible flow on periodic box
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:06
Default
  #5
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
Thanks Dear cfdnewbie
I have some problem for undarstanding what should I do with Neuman B.C. in flow
for example in flow between 2 plates
in each step after solving we see continuity is not satisfied
I can't realize how should I correct Continuity without changing transient answer
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:10
Default
  #6
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
Dear Filippo
Thanks for your reply
As I said I can,t understand some basic concept
I solve first step
and I see continuty is not satisfied
now what should I do?
my BC is Neumann and I have a fix value to itterate and reach it
I don't know how itterate to doesn,t going forward in time
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:15
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by amin144 View Post
Dear Filippo
Thanks for your reply
As I said I can,t understand some basic concept
I solve first step
and I see continuty is not satisfied
now what should I do?
my BC is Neumann and I have a fix value to itterate and reach it
I don't know how itterate to doesn,t going forward in time

are you using a fractional-step/projection method?
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:16
Default
  #8
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
Absolutly yes
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:17
Default
  #9
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
my BC is Neumann and I have a fix value to itterate and reach it
sorry:
my BC is Neumann and I DONT have a fix value to itterate and reach it
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:20
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 11
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
if you need a test-case, it exists an analytical benchmark of a 3d incompressible flow on periodic box

Oh, I would be interested in that one as well...could you provide more details, please? thank you!
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:21
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by amin144 View Post
my BC is Neumann and I have a fix value to itterate and reach it
sorry:
my BC is Neumann and I DONT have a fix value to itterate and reach it
well, after the prediction step for solving the non-solenoidal velocity V*, you use the Hodge decomposition of the vector field:

V* = Vn+1 + grad phi

Taking the divergence of both sides you get the "pressure equation", the BCs are obtained by projecting the decomposition along the normal unit vector.
The problem is well posed and has a unique solution a part a constant.

If you verify that the divergence-free constraint is not verified at the end of the steps, you probabily have fixed wrong BCs.
amin144 likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:23
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfdnewbie View Post
Oh, I would be interested in that one as well...could you provide more details, please? thank you!
C. Ross Ethier and D.A. Steinman, ‘Exact fully 3D Navier–Stokes solutions for benchmarking’, Int. J. Numer.Methods Fluids, 19, 369 (1994).
amin144 likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:27
Thumbs up
  #13
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
well, after the prediction step for solving the non-solenoidal velocity V*, you use the Hodge decomposition of the vector field:

V* = Vn+1 + grad phi

Taking the divergence of both sides you get the "pressure equation", the BCs are obtained by projecting the decomposition along the normal unit vector.
The problem is well posed and has a unique solution a part a constant.

If you verify that the divergence-free constraint is not verified at the end of the steps, you probabily have fixed wrong BCs.
Thanks for your complete reply
my problem I want know this basically
can you introduce me a refrence to study much more in detail?
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:27
Default
  #14
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 11
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
thank you very much, I don't have access to the paper from home, but will check it out tomorrow. From the first page it looks like what they are doing might be a manufactured solution method (adding a forcing source term), is that asssumption correct?
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:34
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfdnewbie View Post
thank you very much, I don't have access to the paper from home, but will check it out tomorrow. From the first page it looks like what they are doing might be a manufactured solution method (adding a forcing source term), is that asssumption correct?

you will see that the solution is unsteady and divergence-free in such a way that the time derivative, convection, pressure gradient and diffusion in the momentum equation balance each others
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:37
Default
  #16
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by amin144 View Post
Thanks for your complete reply
my problem I want know this basically
can you introduce me a refrence to study much more in detail?
you need to start studyng some basical book such as that of Ferziger and Peric. However, you can take as the reference the well know paper of Kim & Moin on JCP http://chainarong.me.engr.tu.ac.th/d...CFD/59-308.pdf.

There are many recent papers on this topic you can read after you have basic knowledge of the projection method
amin144 likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:43
Default
  #17
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
Thanks Dear Filippo
Unfortunately some question haven't answered in any book and the key is finding someOne that have some works in this fields
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:47
Default
  #18
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by amin144 View Post
Thanks Dear Filippo
Unfortunately some question haven't answered in any book and the key is finding someOne that have some works in this fields
the work of Kim & Moin is the starting point to understand the method, I think is useful for you...

I have also some of my papers discussing the property of the Hodge decomposition in the projection method, you can find them on the IJNMF
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 17:56
Default
  #19
Member
 
Amin Shariat KHah
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shiraz
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 6
amin144 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
If you verify that the divergence-free constraint is not verified at the end of the steps, you probabily have fixed wrong BCs.
I studied the method and I am not very amateur
I saw in papers that neumann BC cause problem in continuty but I cant remember that paper unfortunately

if I understood good you are saying if everything be ok continuty should be satisfied even in case with neumann BC?

Have you any paper using this method in a simulation case?
amin144 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2012, 18:04
Default
  #20
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,568
Rep Power: 20
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by amin144 View Post
I studied the method and I am not very amateur
I saw in papers that neumann BC cause problem in continuty but I cant remember that paper unfortunately

if I understood good you are saying if everything be ok continuty should be satisfied even in case with neumann BC?

Have you any paper using this method in a simulation case?

the issue is not simple to explain in few words ... you need to distinguish if you are using an exact projection method or an approximate projection method. In the latter case you do not satisfy exactly div V =0 but only up to the magnitude of the local truncation error.
Try to read:

F.M. Denaro,
On the application of the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition in projection methods for the numerical solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with general boundary conditions, Int. J. Num. Methods in Fluids, 43, 2003

F.M. Denaro, A 3D second-order accurate projection-based Finite Volume code on non-staggered, non-uniform structured grids with continuity preserving properties: application to buoyancy-driven flows,Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 52, 4, 393-432, 2006.
amin144 likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with transient solution of flow past a row of cylinders jostanek Main CFD Forum 0 January 6, 2010 13:16
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS OF JET FLOW shriramjegan FLUENT 0 July 28, 2007 12:04
transient compressible flow simulation-urgent JSM FLUENT 0 April 26, 2007 01:51
transient compressible flow problem (urgent plz) jehanzeb FLUENT 5 August 3, 2004 08:04
PhD in turbulence Hans Main CFD Forum 14 October 8, 2001 03:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49.