Consider the Neumann condition (dimensional)
q = -k dT/dn, at a surface with n unit normal outward to surface, then from your definition you simply get: q = k (Tw-To) dTheta/dn The quantity q /k (Tw -To) is a known term of your problem so you have hust to discretize the derivative at the surface |
How would I know Tw? The only thing that I have defined at the boundaries is q.
|
Quote:
you have to know (Tw -To) from data of your physical problem |
So i'm missing something. Say i'm solving for a flow through parallel plates. The initial condition is that theta is 1 everywehere.
If I am solving for a constant wall temperature, then I can set the boundary conditions for theta to be 0 at the surface of the plates. I haven't used Tw or To anywhere. So for the constant heat flux case, shouldn't I be able to do the same by defining some boundary condition on the wall that does not involve dimensional values? Also Tw will change as the flow progresses, shouldn't I be solving for this in the code instead of inputing it? |
Can you define Tin? I'll check when I get a chance, but I think I solved your model knowing Tin and then backing out the Tw based on the q..It's been a long time. But, I do think you will have to have a temp defined somewhere
|
the quantity q /k (Tw -To) is substantially the Nusselt number, therefore you can fix an arbitrary Nusselt value for your numerical purposes without taking care of your physical values.
Of course you cannot say what is the physical problem until you specify (Tw-To) ... |
Energy equation is an elliptic differential equation. Therefore, you will not be able to solve by defining neuman conditions on all boundaries.
|
I guess his T0 at inlet is used in a Dirichlet sense
|
Then he must be solving a thermally developing flow
|
So I am able to define Tin, however I am trying to find the nusselt number for this particular flow. Therefore I can't define the temperature at the wall but only the gradient. I have made some progress but I am getting kinda stuck.
I have redefined my non dimensional temperature to be Where T_L is the the temperature at the end of the heated section calculated by q=m*c_p*(T_L-Tin). As a result I find that This way I should be able to define a neumann condition at the boundary. This logically makes sense however I think that my dimensionless temperature field should be roughly bounded by 0, however my code seems to run to negative theta which is confusing me at the moment. Alternately I have seen some texts define theta as When I work out the boundary condition with this definition it is strange because the gradient no longer becomes dependent on q'' so I am confused. Could someone perhaps verify that the first formulation I have for theta is correct and that my code is just doing something wrong? |
your temperature field should be bounded 0<= theta<=1, this is if the correct reference quantities are chosen
|
How to deal with non dimensional energy equation?
Hi, peter,
Could you tell me more about how did you deal with non dimensional energy equation? When you set your boundary condition, you set your temperature as a number between 0 and 1? And you talked about using an UDF, what did you use the UDF to define? Boundary condition? Thanks a lot. |
... A bit late, but still...
If you normalize the temperature that way, than the (normalized flux) = flux*(Tw-T0)/K. It therefore follows that the dimensional prescribed flux is replace by the normalized BC: (prescribed normalized flux) = d(theta) / dn where n is the normal coordinate. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13. |