|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Kailash
Join Date: May 2011
Location: London, UK
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hello all,
Need some advice. I currently use CFD for turbomachinery, with models little more than half a million cells (one blade passage steady state) and the solution converges in about 3 hours (2000 sweeps) on a 6 core PC. I am about to use several full geometry model with about 10 million cells for both steady and unsteady computation. I am sure that I need additional computational resources. I am planning to expand the computational resources so that I would be able to see the solution within 12 hrs. I am confused what to get, single or several high end PC/work station or a small cluster?? 1. which would be suitable for my case? 2. which would be better on a longer run for lesser CFD turn around times? 3. which is more advantageous in terms of maintenance, flexibility and cost effectiveness? Kindly share your expertise Kind Regards, K |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| is there any money in CFD? | T | Main CFD Forum | 35 | May 9, 2001 19:35 |
| CFD for fans & blower housings | David Carroll | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 24, 2000 17:25 |
| CFD Design...The CFD Future | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 19 | October 6, 1999 11:57 |
| PC vs. Workstation | Tim Franke | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 29, 1999 15:01 |
| public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 11:44 |