Yes you are right.
|
Quote:
|
Hello Mechi,
unfortunately I didn't use the hyperbolic method in my meshing software. However, John indeed have a deep experience in this topic. and I'm really enjoying his replies. |
Quote:
Thanks for your response. |
Quote:
|
You can put cuts (assuming you're talking about an O-grid topology) wherever you want. It's just topology and has nothing to do with the generation of the grid itself via the elliptic PDE method.
Also, you could just as easily use a C-grid or H-grid toplogy. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
But I am facing a problem in generation of ellipti grid. As I itererate my grids move away from outer boundary. I have attached the image file. Could you please guide me furthur. |
I have no idea what's causing that and honestly it looks like a bug. But you've now opened the issue of control functions for the elliptic PDEs other than Laplace's equation which tends toward smooth isotropy. My suggestion is to look at Thompson's book.
|
Automated mesh generation
Hi Ahmed,
Cheers for attempting a difficult problem. As some of them have suggested, the main problems are meshing complex moving geometries. For example, I.C Engine valves and cooling holes in gas turbines. Additional problems arise when you try to add refinement in these cases. That being said, there are commercial programs that take a shot at doing this. For example, CONVERGE CFD can mesh complex moving geometries automatically using a cut-cell cartesian method. In addition to this the software also supports automatic mesh refinement based on the gradients in the solution. Now in your efforts what classes of problems are you trying to solve ? This is a big question that you need to ask in-order to formulate a work-plan. Thanks, Sarang |
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:54. |