# Boundary condition for periodic flow solution in Gambit

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 20, 2012, 03:38 Boundary condition for periodic flow solution in Gambit #1 New Member   ghorban mahtabi Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 6 Using periodic condition for the entrance and exit of a channel, I solve a problem in Gambit, trying to reach a fully developed velocity distribution pattern. But the problem I face is that Gambit won't allow the action for some settings concerning boundary condition maybe mistaken.Any Ideas for boundary condition settings? Yours, Etc.

 March 20, 2012, 14:36 #2 Senior Member     Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 573 Blog Entries: 14 Rep Power: 18 Dear ghorban, there is a basic distinction between setting boundary conditions in a grid generator (say gambit) and setting them in a solver (say Fluent). What you do in a grid generator is simply putting a label on a face/volume or a group of faces/volumes which then is hopefully recognized by the selected solver. The real b.c. setting and or modification actually happens in the solver, which nonetheless can be helped by the settings in the grid generator. The case of periodicity in the Gambit/Fluent couple is non standard with respect to the other boundary conditions and requires a little more explanation. First, in Gambit you may have to use the periodicity function (i don't remember now the actual name) for the selected couple of periodic faces. That is, if you mesh them with an unstructured grid it is unlikely that they will end up with the same traslated/rotated face mesh unless you use this option. However, this is a grid generation option and has nothing to do with the boundary conditions. Second, to use periodicity in Fluent, you can simply leave the two faces as walls in gambit and then, after reading the grid, digit within the Fluent TUI: /mesh/modify-zones/make-periodic which prompts you some questions to define the periodicity. After that, the periodic conditions have to be defined, that is a driving pressure gradient or mass flow rate has to be defined. And you are done.

 March 20, 2012, 17:22 #3 New Member   ghorban mahtabi Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 6 Dear Paolo thank you for valuable guidance,they were very profitable for me. with regard.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post peob OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 August 14, 2014 09:07 Mohsin FLUENT 1 October 6, 2011 07:22 jiejie OpenFOAM 12 March 3, 2011 11:35 Sima Phoenics 1 December 1, 2007 19:55 vivian FLUENT 5 April 21, 2006 06:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44.