|April 7, 2012, 09:30||
new to CFD
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 63Rep Power: 5
Iím new to CFD softwares and it's theory. Searching on google I created some doubts. My intentions on CFD are external flows around wings and fuselages, extracting from the simulations the Cd and Cl of 2D and 3D geometries.
1- The precision of CFD method against experimental ones ?
2- Ansys (fluente/CFX) precision vs Solid Works flow ?
3- Possibilities of exporting geometry from a 64 bits CAD software to Ansys 32 bits (12) ?
4- On hardware is the processor more important than the RAM memory ?
|April 7, 2012, 23:36||
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56Rep Power: 6
I can answer the 1st and 2nd doubt that you have.
The precision depends on many things like mesh quality. The turbulence model you chose for simulating flow, and solution method taken to solve i.e higher order and lower order.
A good mesh along with suitable turbulence model and higher order solution methods can give wonderful results. I cant say that its 100% accurate but it can really be a robust tool for preliminary prediction of flow. Even the wind tunnel has many errors, you may have the wall effects and human errors in operating the wind tunnel. So, CFD is a tool for preliminary flow field prediction and then when changes are made in design only final model is checked in wind tunnel which can reduce the cost of design and optimization. If accuracy is not very important some people also do not conduct wind tunnel test they conduct designing and optimization only using CFD.
2. In my opinion for external flow, CFX and FLUENT are great. No idea about internal flow.
Hope this helps.
|April 8, 2012, 17:32||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 227Rep Power: 9
1. The relative accuracy of CFD versus experiment is an ongoing issue. Bottom line, you can get very accurate results using CFD for external flow around wings and fuselages. As a point of reference, search for "drag prediction workshop."
2. Not to be mean or anything, but I think you'll find Fluent and CFX to be more high fidelity than SolidWorks Simulation.
3. Exporting from 64-bit CAD to 32-bit CFD happens all the time. It should not be a problem.
4. Both processor and RAM are important. More RAM might give you more bang for your buck as they say.
Welcome to the world of CFD! Good luck.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD||CD adapco Group Marketing||CD-adapco||0||February 13, 2002 13:23|
|Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001||John C. Chien||Main CFD Forum||36||January 24, 2001 22:10|
|ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001||Chris R. Kleijn||Main CFD Forum||0||August 21, 2000 04:49|
|Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package.||Tareq Al-shaalan||Main CFD Forum||10||June 12, 1999 23:27|
|public CFD Code development||Heinz Wilkening||Main CFD Forum||38||March 5, 1999 12:44|