
[Sponsors] 
September 29, 2005, 15:35 
Channel flow setup in Largeeddy simulation

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi,I am now using LES model, and am going to run a fullydeveloped planar channel flow as a validation test. I read some papers, but there are still some questions about the details of the setup of the channel test. I wonder if you could give me a help. I'd appreciate it very much.
I use finite volume method to discretize the NS equations. Pressure Poisson equation is solved to enforce the continuity and to get the pressure. The input for this problem is channel width, Reynolds number based on the friction velocity. And my questions are: 1. In some papers, the mean pressure gradient is added in the form of a source term in the momentum equation. I think that is to say decompose the pressure into a mean pressure plus a fluctuation and then do the filtering. Thus the pressure we are solving is the filtered pressure fluctuation. What is the appropriate boundary condition for it? 2. Is the mean pressure gradient fixed or changed before the flow reaches the statistically steady state? If it is changed, how does it change? 3. Why do people put some random noises into the initial velocity field? As I read from your book, the initial condition will not affect the final steady state solution. 4. Some papers say the simulation was performed with a constant mass flow rate. How to implement it, especially before the flow reaches the statistically steady state? Thank you very much. 

September 30, 2005, 04:10 
Re: Channel flow setup in Largeeddy simulation

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

1. No. The pressure gradient is linear and so can be split into a sum of two parts without changing anything. The split is simply a mechanism to allow periodic conditions to be applied directly at inlet/exit for the varying part of the pressure gradient. An alternative would be to code a constant jump in pressure between inlet and exit into the implementation of the implicit pressure solvers periodic boundary conditions.
2. It depends on what conditions you are imposing on the simulation. It is usually fixed but might be varied very slightly at each iteration to enforce a force balance depending on what is being imposed to drive the flow. 3. (You have not read my book.) It does not affect the answer but it shortens the initial period when things are settling down: the transition from laminar to fully turbulent can take a long time. 4. See other thread. One simply sets up boundary conditions to maintain a constant mass flow and a force balance on the boundary. It can be useful for developing inlet conditions for a large downstream simulation which, physically, would prevent significant variations in mass flow. Alternatively one could simply scale the more usual type of simulation. 

September 30, 2005, 11:00 
Re: Channel flow setup in Largeeddy simulation

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thanks, Andy. It was a typo for 'your book'.
1. Do you apply periodic boundary condition at inlet/exit for pressure gradient? Can I apply it for the pressure itself? 4. I understand that starting from a laminar velocity field will shorten the transition time to fullydeveloped turbulent flow. I just don't know why to add the random noise. So I guess it is also a technique to shorten the initial period. 

September 30, 2005, 16:03 
Re: Channel flow setup in Largeeddy simulation

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

1. You apply periodic conditions to the fluctuating component of pressure  it is the same level at inlet and exit. The constant pressure gradient body force takes care of the decrease in pressure along the duct. The actual pressure can be recovered for plotting purposes by integrating the body force pressure gradient down the duct and adding it to the fluctuating compoent.
4. Starting from a laminar velocity field is likely to lengthen the time to reach fully developed turbulence not shorten it. By adding random noise the intention is to speed up the transition to fully developed turbulence. It is not particularly important and often achieves relatively little because uncorrelated random noise will decay away very fast. Starting from on old turbulent solution is usually more effective but the savings are not dramatic and rarely worth spending much time on. 

September 30, 2005, 16:46 
Re: Channel flow setup in Largeeddy simulation

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Andy, your reply really helps a lot. Thank you.
Archie, I got your email, but the reply email was bounced back, and I don't know why. My email is wmoengr~gmail.com. (~ substituted by @). Thank you. 

January 24, 2012, 06:16 
UDF for pressure variation

#6 
Member

Hii friends
My problem is flow through river channel, I have taken a orbitary region so at exit of my geometry flow exits into river itself. so i need to know how to apply UDf at exit, as pressure must vary with P=row*g*h. my exit cross section is not uniform so what should i do please help. is it possible to apply custom field function ???? in fluent please help ASAP 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
2D Large Eddy Simulation with fluent?  Barry Cole  FLUENT  4  October 2, 2013 13:36 
Freestream Setup in an External Flow Simulation  phathomie27  STARCCM+  0  October 20, 2009 18:38 
LES fully developed channel flow  Gem  FLUENT  4  May 12, 2005 05:30 
Large eddy simulation  Danney  CFX  2  March 6, 2003 21:47 
Large Eddy Simulation  Raul  CFX  5  October 6, 2002 09:29 