|March 18, 2013, 07:24||
Fire FAME Hexa or Ansys Icem for Internal Nozzle Flow
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1Rep Power: 0
For my Bachelor Thesis i'm trying so simulate the internal nozzle flow of a direct injection for a 4-stroke engine with AVL Fire.
A useable CAD Model of the injector already exists.
In publications therefore many authors used Ansys Icem for the meshing. Why?
In my opinion using AVL FAME Hexa would be easier because then you can work with selections and edges created with Fire.
Unfortunally I could find any Information about the Advantages of Icem in the Internet. That's why I'm asking you for help. So what are the big differences of the meshing tools? Why is Icem therefore used more often.
Sorry for my bad english. I would be very thanksful for help. Thanks
Have a nice Day!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|[ANSYS Meshing] Can ANSYS ICEM CFD produce quadratic hexa?||a79755172||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||4||May 24, 2015 04:56|
|calculate a nozzle flow using rhoCentralFoam||hg2lf||OpenFOAM||0||October 25, 2012 21:26|
|[Other] Ansys Meshing vs Ansys ICEM CFD||RicochetJ||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||5||September 19, 2012 09:48|
|Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach #||Axel Rohde||Main CFD Forum||1||November 19, 2001 13:19|
|fluid flow fundas||ram||Main CFD Forum||5||June 17, 2000 21:31|