CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Special Topics > Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing

Software to mesh using high order element with unevenly spaced interpolation node

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 8, 2016, 23:32
Unhappy Software to mesh using high order element with unevenly spaced interpolation node
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 9
lzhaok6 is on a distinguished road
I'm looking for a software that would be able to generate 3D mesh using spectral element method. By saying spectral element, I mean the gird points are not evenly distributed when high order interpolation is used (e.g. Gauss-Lobatto points).

Softwares I know (e.g. Abaqus, gmsh, Patran...) only allow evenly spaced interpolation nodes. Abaqus seems to allow users to generate their own element type and do the meshing manually. But the illustration in user manual is not very specific. Patran could insert offset point into an individual element but not for all element. (element type can not be defined)

Any advice would be appreciated!
lzhaok6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2016, 18:20
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Phil Sakievich
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
psakievich is on a distinguished road
Typically the Gauss-Lobatto points are incorporated on the internals of the element since they are used as the basis/shape functions. A standard mesh should do and then the internals of each element will have the GL points based on the level of p refinements you are using.
psakievich is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2016, 23:01
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 9
lzhaok6 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by psakievich View Post
Typically the Gauss-Lobatto points are incorporated on the internals of the element since they are used as the basis/shape functions. A standard mesh should do and then the internals of each element will have the GL points based on the level of p refinements you are using.
Thank you psakievich! That was very helpful.
lzhaok6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2016, 23:22
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Phil Sakievich
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
psakievich is on a distinguished road
My pleasure. Also if you plan to use higher order elements remember they don't need to be as small as your standard FV mesh. The elements can be larger since you are getting more points inside of them and they are higher order. If you mesh with the standard for low order methods the size of the model in memory will blow up quickly.
psakievich is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2016, 00:01
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 9
lzhaok6 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by psakievich View Post
My pleasure. Also if you plan to use higher order elements remember they don't need to be as small as your standard FV mesh. The elements can be larger since you are getting more points inside of them and they are higher order. If you mesh with the standard for low order methods the size of the model in memory will blow up quickly.
Got it. Thanks again for reminding me that!
lzhaok6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
finite element analysis, finite element method, mesh, software, spectral method


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 03:19
Calculation of the Governing Equations Mihail CFX 7 September 7, 2014 06:27
[Other] 2D hex mesh on multi element airfoil Verfblikje OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 January 19, 2012 10:55
High order interpolation mbuffat OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 October 15, 2008 03:47
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41.