CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Fidelity CFD

Turbo vs. Open

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 23, 2016, 18:09
Default Turbo vs. Open
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 16
turbo is on a distinguished road
I have recently seen a new product, "Fine Open" in Numeca website. Can anyone clarify how different it is from "Fine Turbo"?
turbo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 29, 2016, 03:35
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Colinda
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brussels
Posts: 151
Rep Power: 13
colinda1 is on a distinguished road
FINE/Turbo is NUMECA's turbomachinery dedicated environment for structured mesh generation (AutoGrid5)and structured solver.

FINE/Open with OpenLabs is the environment based on the FINE/Open unstructured solver and includes an unstructured mesh generator. Even if FINE/Open with OpenLabs can be used for many types of applications, it is also used for turbomachinery applications where e.g. for the wheel a structured mesh is created in AutoGrid5 while the spiral casing is meshed in HEXPRESS (unstructured mesh). Putting the two meshes together, the computation is then performed in FINE/Open with OpenLabs.

Best regards,
Colinda
colinda1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 29, 2016, 08:48
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 16
turbo is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your kind explanation.
Another question is if the solver core logic will be identical between the two, resulting in the same solution. The only difference will be whether to allow unstructured mesh?
turbo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 2016, 07:58
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Colinda
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brussels
Posts: 151
Rep Power: 13
colinda1 is on a distinguished road
--- due to the general treatment on unstructured grids, certain algorithms such as calculation of viscous stresses, or source terms in turbulence models, are programmed differently, even when applied on structured grids
--- on very fine grids the results will be very close
---- but on coarser grids, some differences might appear, depending on the complexity of the flow.
colinda1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 2016, 09:44
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 16
turbo is on a distinguished road
Thanks. Good answer.
turbo is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow NiFl OpenFOAM Community Contributions 14 November 25, 2020 03:30
[Other] Adding solvers from DensityBasedTurbo to foam-extend 3.0 Seroga OpenFOAM Community Contributions 9 June 12, 2015 17:18
SparceImage v1.7.x Issue on MAC OS X rcarmi OpenFOAM Installation 4 August 14, 2014 06:42
OpenFOAM without MPI kokizzu OpenFOAM Installation 4 May 26, 2014 09:17
centOS 5.6 : paraFoam not working yossi OpenFOAM Installation 2 October 9, 2013 01:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53.