 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
October 12, 2011, 10:21
|
Why is there a great difference between numeca and cfx????
|
#1 |
|
New Member
ski
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 2  |
Hello,I am simulating a low-speed compressor now,the maximum inlet velocity is 30m/s. but i found that at the corner of stators there is a great total pressure loss in numeca while in the cfx the loss is much smaller. I have used sa and some low Reynolds number k-e model in numeca and rng-ke and k-e model in cfx. The yplus is around 2 in both soft.
Why is there a great difference between numeca and cfx? |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shock capture in CFX | BalanceChen | CFX | 2 | June 7, 2011 07:25 |
| Import CFXTurbogrid(*.gtm) file to NUMECA | csmistry | NUMECA | 5 | March 12, 2011 01:57 |
| CFX, Fluent and Numeca? | SA | FLUENT | 3 | March 22, 2008 15:46 |
| Can Numeca mesh export to other format? | Andy Cong | NUMECA | 1 | April 4, 2006 06:18 |
| NUMECA vs CFX | Iann | NUMECA | 5 | February 24, 2006 15:26 |
Linear Mode
