CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Bugs

Lagrangian and Continous field donbt match after formToVTK

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 28, 2008, 10:35
Default Hallo everyone, description
  #1
Member
 
Sebastian Vogl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 8
sebastian_vogl is on a distinguished road
Hallo everyone,

description of problem:
I simulated the evaporation of single droplets of C7H16 in air. I used the dieselFoam (OpenFoam version 1.4.1 dev) solver. The geometry slightly differs from the aachenbomb test case (see attached files). The input files were taken from this test case however changed to make single droplets.
I chose a simulation time step of 1e-6s and wrote every time step in the processor folders. I decomposed the case in 4 parts and reckoned it on 4 CPU's. As I didn't want to reconstruct and transform to VTK every single time step, as it would have taken too much time and memory on my disk and isn't necessary for me, I decided to write only every 10th time step into the processor folders, reconstruct and transform them to VTK. When I watched the reconstructed time steps in paraview (version 3.3) I found out that the time step of the Lagrangian field (i.e position, temperature, diameter etc. of the droplets) is at least one reconstructed time step before the surrounding air (i.e temperature of the air, amount of evaporated C7H16 in the air, etc.). That means when I reconstruct every 1e-5s, the lagrangian field is 1e-5s before the continuous phase and when I reconstruct every 1e-4s, the difference between the two phase is 1e-4s. This problem doesn't appear, or at least I can't see a difference in the development of both phases, when I reconstruct and transform into VTK every reckoned time step.
Then I decided to write all time steps in the processor foldes, but only reconstructed and transformed to VTK those of interest, however the result is the same. Then I wrote all time steps (1e-6s) and reconstructed them all but only transformed to VTK every 10th time step. Nothing improved which led me to the conclusion that it doesn't have anything to do with the reconstructing process (as I asumed) but with the foamToVTK process. My assumtion was confirmed when I reckoned the case serial (on one CPU) with a reduced simulation time step on 1e-4s whereas I wrote into the processor files, reconstructed and transformed to VTK only every 50th simulatied time step. The situation didn't change.

For me it seems that there's is something wrong with the foamToVTK module.
I would be glad to hear your opinion about that.
Thank you very much in advance for your time!

Sincerely,
Sebastian Vogl


Solver: dieselFoam
version: OpenFoam 1.4.1 dev; paraview 3.
platform: openSuSe 10.3


picture with the described proble:




I attached some files of my case:

0-files:

T

U

p


constant files:

environmentalProperties

injectorProperties

sprayProperties

blockMeshDict

system file:

controlDict
sebastian_vogl is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how 2 freeze 1 phase flow field & start lagrangian KK CFX 5 February 14, 2008 17:48
I donbt understand antopnieta OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 January 15, 2008 15:44
ReadCHEMKINIII donbt work mavimo OpenFOAM Bugs 1 August 23, 2007 11:49
I donbt want to use wall funtions How can I do it pablo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 29, 2006 17:48
Donbt save bak adorean OpenFOAM 0 March 10, 2005 05:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:37.