| JinBiao |
June 20, 2011 00:37 |
Report a bug in LienCubicKELowReSetWallDissipation.H
This head file sets the value of epsilon in the near wall cell. In order to consider the possibility that one cell may contain more than one wall-boundary faces. It contains the average function as follow.
Code:
forAll(patches, patchi)
{
const fvPatch& curPatch = patches[patchi];
if (isA<wallFvPatch>(curPatch))
{
forAll(curPatch, facei)
{
label faceCelli = curPatch.faceCells()[facei];
// For corner cells (with two boundary or more faces),
// epsilon in the near-wall cell are calculated as an average
cellBoundaryFaceCount[faceCelli]++;
epsilon_[faceCelli] +=
Cmu75*pow(k_[faceCelli], 1.5)
/(
kappa_.value()*y_[faceCelli]
*(1.0 - exp(-Aepsilon_.value()*yStar_[faceCelli]))
)
*exp(-Amu_.value()*sqr(yStar_[faceCelli]));
}
}
}
// perform the averaging
forAll(patches, patchi)
{
const fvPatch& curPatch = patches[patchi];
if (isA<wallFvPatch>(curPatch))
{
forAll(curPatch, facei)
{
label faceCelli = curPatch.faceCells()[facei];
epsilon_[faceCelli] /= cellBoundaryFaceCount[faceCelli];
}
}
}
For example, the cell i have two wall-boundary faces, then cellBoundaryFaceCount[i]=2. But the epsilon_ in the cell i will be divided by 2 twice. It is to say the epsilon_ is actually divided by 4. To remedy this bug, I replace the code above with
Code:
forAll(patches, patchi)
{
const fvPatch& curPatch = patches[patchi];
if (isA<wallFvPatch>(curPatch))
{
forAll(curPatch, facei)
{
label faceCelli = curPatch.faceCells()[facei];
// For corner cells (with two boundary or more faces),
// epsilon in the near-wall cell are calculated as an average
cellBoundaryFaceCount[faceCelli]++;
label n = cellBoundaryFaceCount[faceCelli];
scalar eps_n =
Cmu75*pow(k_[faceCelli], 1.5)
/(
kappa_.value()*y_[faceCelli]
*(1.0 - exp(-Aepsilon_.value()*yStar_[faceCelli]))
)
*exp(-Amu_.value()*sqr(yStar_[faceCelli]));
// eps_ave = [(n-1)*eps_{n-1} + eps_n]/n
epsilon_[faceCelli] = ((n-1)*epsilon_[faceCelli] + eps_n) / n;;
}
}
}
Best,
Jinbiao |
