|
[Sponsors] |
[OpenFOAM.org] Installation on archlinux: Docker image vs compile from source |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 11, 2021, 12:41 |
Installation on archlinux: Docker image vs compile from source
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi to all,
I'm using archlinux and I would like to install openfoam.org. I have two option: 1) use the docker image 2) compile from source (there is an AUR PKGBUILD). Is there any difference when executing? I think that the docker image could be more "stable"* and easier to update, but I do not know if there is any performance or usability issue when using it. Can you help me choosing the correct way to install, please? * being archlinux a rolling release and being openfoam not included in the official repository, it is possible that after updating a dependency a recompilation of Openfoam is required |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Invalid Normals for source face to target face while making AMI? | Sorabh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | August 3, 2021 06:35 |
polynomial BC | srv537 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 4 | December 3, 2016 09:07 |
[OpenFOAM.org] Error creating ParaView-4.1.0 OpenFOAM 2.3.0 | tlcoons | OpenFOAM Installation | 13 | April 20, 2016 17:34 |
[OpenFOAM.org] A Mac OS X of23x Development Environment Using Docker | rt08 | OpenFOAM Installation | 1 | February 28, 2016 19:00 |
[Other] How to use finite area method in official OpenFOAM 2.2.0? | Detian Liu | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | November 3, 2015 03:04 |