CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others

Boundary Patch definition on Thin Surfaces / Internal Walls in SnappyHex

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 6, 2011, 04:47
Default Boundary Patch definition on Thin Surfaces / Internal Walls in SnappyHex
  #1
Member
 
Hannes
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Schleswig, Germany
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8
Hannes_Kiel is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I'm trying to generate a mesh around a thin surface / internal wall like a sail. Basically, it works fine, the STL surface mesh is found, properly resolved and written out as external faces / boundary patch. My problem is the following: I haven't managed to assign different boundary patch identifiers to the two sides of the surface, both sides are within one patch with associated normals pointing both directions. I cannot separate them by mergeOrSplitBaffles as the nodes of both sides are not identical. When importing two identical STL surfaces meshes with opposed normals, I get two patches, both seriously fragmented. I know that some have just assigned a finite thickness to their geometry when working on similar problems, others (Russo et al) have written additional routines to get around it. I'm trying to avoid both.

Does anybody know whether a) there is a way to either generate a volume mesh around an infinetly thin geometry with both sides in separate boundary patches or b) split the single boundary patch into two along the edges?

Cheers,
Hannes
Hannes_Kiel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2012, 06:18
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Stefanie Schiffer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 7
StSchiff is on a distinguished road
Hello Hannes,
I have the same problem you had, trying to mesh a surface of zeroThickness, but snappy messes up the surface normals. Did you ever find a workaround the problem?
Regards
Stefanie
StSchiff is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 2, 2012, 01:55
Default
  #3
Member
 
Hannes
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Schleswig, Germany
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8
Hannes_Kiel is on a distinguished road
Hi Stefanie,

I gave up trying as I had to work on other, more pressing, topics and could generate suitable meshes using ICEM. It might be worth a try to see whether enGrid or Salome are capabel of generating such meshes.

Cheers,
Hannes
Hannes_Kiel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 2, 2012, 04:22
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Stefanie Schiffer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 7
StSchiff is on a distinguished road
Hi Hannes,
thanks for your reply, I'll keep trying to get in to work with snappy but maybe also have a look into other meshing tools.
Stefanie
StSchiff is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2013, 01:06
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Ripudaman Manchanda
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 4
ripudaman is on a distinguished road
Hi Stefanie,

Were you able to figure out a solution to this problem? I am trying to do something similar. I want to split this internal boundary and want to apply different boundary conditions on the two mirror faces.

Regards,
Ripu
ripudaman is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
sail, snappyhexmesh, thin

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12
New topic on same subject - Flow around race car Tudor Miron CFX 15 April 2, 2004 06:18
Please help with flow around car modelling! Tudor Miron CFX 17 March 19, 2004 20:23
Modelling thin surfaces in 5.6 Louwrens CFX 0 August 16, 2003 10:47
Internal surfaces for post-processor. cfd guy CFX 3 November 19, 2002 15:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:36.