|February 19, 2010, 08:35||
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3Rep Power: 8
Im working with the dynamic mesh refinement known from i.e. the dambreak-case (dynamicRefineFvMesh.C) and everything works fine as long as i create a 3D-case.
I want to simulate a 2D-case with "empty"-type boundaries, but when i do so it wont work, because the count of cells is not equal to the count of faces (seems to be the restriction for 2D-cases).
So i would like to refine the cells just in the xy-plane to solve my problem.
Is there a simple method to do so?
|May 31, 2010, 03:08||
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21Rep Power: 7
Hallo at all,
I am interested in the same problem. I would like to use dynamicRefineFvMesh to increase the mesh-refinement at the detonation front in detonation simulations.
In order to reduce the number of cells i'd like to refine the mesh only in two directions (as it is possible in the static version refineMesh).
I know already that the refinement is done by hexRef8.c, but i do not really know what is going on there. Does somebody have experiences with this or any idea how to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Adaptive Mesh Refinement and Cyclic Boundary Conditions||adona058||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||6||October 23, 2009 09:17|
|Convergence moving mesh||lr103476||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||30||November 19, 2007 15:09|
|Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option?||Joe||CFX||2||March 26, 2007 18:10|
|Mesh refinement and the errors.||Korsh Mik||CFX||0||January 11, 2006 08:07|
|Different temperature after mesh refinement!?||Mark||CFX||3||October 14, 2004 21:18|