|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hey all,
I am seeing some interesting behavior from snappyHexMesh. Firstly, I am noticing that no matter what value I put for "maxBoundarySkewness" and "maxInternalSkewness," I get the same max skew (which is well over both limits.) This is a contrast from behavior with say maxOrthoLimit, where the mesh always has a maximum non orthogonality right under the limit I set in the snappyhexmeshdict. Secondly, when the final mesh comes out, checkMesh reports a skew of 13. But at the same time it reports no skew over 5 & 6 when using the "read user-defined mesh quality criterions from system/meshQualityDict" This is quite a contradiction! Perhaps there is a bug in the way skewness is calculated? Any ideas or suggestions? Code:
Checking geometry...
Overall domain bounding box (-15769.6 -10240 -50) (43622.4 0.117284 9166)
Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1)
Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1)
Boundary openness (-2.88268e-17 -3.10419e-15 1.05031e-15) OK.
Max cell openness = 5.335e-16 OK.
Max aspect ratio = 33.8837 OK.
Minimum face area = 0.00472708. Maximum face area = 1.09071e+06. Face area magnitudes OK.
Min volume = 0.00616825. Max volume = 1.0742e+09. Total volume = 5.60324e+12. Cell volumes OK.
Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 79.9759 average: 9.86647
*Number of severely non-orthogonal faces: 2021.
Non-orthogonality check OK.
<<Writing 2021 non-orthogonal faces to set nonOrthoFaces
Face pyramids OK.
***Max skewness = 13.1088, 1239 highly skew faces detected which may impair the quality of the results
<<Writing 1239 skew faces to set skewFaces
Coupled point location match (average 0) OK.
Checking faces in error :
non-orthogonality > 80 degrees : 0
faces with face pyramid volume < 1e-13 : 0
faces with concavity > 80 degrees : 4
faces with skewness > 5 (internal) or 6 (boundary) : 0
faces with interpolation weights (0..1) < 0.05 : 102
faces with volume ratio of neighbour cells < 0.01 : 0
faces with face twist < 0.05 : 197
faces on cells with determinant < 0.001 : 0
<<Writing 303 faces in error to set meshQualityFaces
Failed 2 mesh checks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Ali
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2 ![]() |
I am facing the same problem. did anyone come up with a solution for that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Håkon Strandenes
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
I think this might be related to a bug that is already reported: http://www.openfoam.org/mantisbt/view.php?id=825
Someone are probably working on it, and hopefully there will be a fix soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Jose Rey
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Isn't the bug report only for the checkMesh utility (severity=minor)? I didn't see reference to the problem in snappyHexMesh which should be severity=high. Is this correct?
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Håkon Strandenes
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Sorry, my bad. When I saw this message, I thought "I remember something about a bug tagged with snappyHexMesh and skewness limits", and I didn't read properly before I posted.
Anyways, If you think this is a bug, report it. This might in the end be related to bug #825, since both checkMesh and snappyHexMesh does use some of the same classes when dealing with meshes. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| ignoring, skew |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SnappyHexMesh with local refinement of ONE STLfile | wolle1982 | OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities | 14 | March 24, 2012 17:33 |
| Strange Results With snappyHexMesh | calebamiles | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 14, 2011 16:02 |
| stitchMesh and snappyHexMesh | gdbaldw | OpenFOAM | 0 | December 23, 2009 02:09 |
| SnappyHexMesh not generate mesh first time | mavimo | OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities | 4 | August 26, 2008 07:08 |
| OpenFOAM14 for Mac OSX Darwin 104 | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 118 | July 20, 2008 05:19 |