CFD Online Discussion Forums - Wiki solver guides

Page 1 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)

- OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-news-announcements-other/)

- - Wiki solver guides (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-news-announcements-other/73035-wiki-solver-guides.html)

alberto

February 25, 2010 01:57

Wiki solver guides

Hi,

a few days ago I updated the following guides on the wiki, for those interested:

scalarTransportFoam: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/ScalarTransportFoam
bubbleFoam: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/BubbleFoam

If you have comments, suggestions or questions, please use this thread.

This is part of the content that should have gone in the documentation project, and the structure used for the guides is very similar to what was the structure of the documents that should have become part of it. Since it did not work out for the reasons we know, I decided to put on the wiki the part of the material I was working on. Keeping it on my hard drive was not helping anybody. :)

More will come in some time, since rearranging the format is all but fun (no LaTeX macros can be defined to my knowledge on the wiki. If you know a way, please share :D).

Best,

wyldckat

March 16, 2010 18:42

Hi Alberto,

I've seen you're other thread about these same guides, but only just recently saw this thread...

Quote:

Originally Posted by alberto (Post 247302)

More will come in some time, since rearranging the format is all but fun (no LaTeX macros can be defined to my knowledge on the wiki. If you know a way, please share :D).

It's been a while since I last used LaTeX, so I think there are at least two possible interpretations for "LaTeX macros":

wiki macros that interpret LaTeX;
"porting" LaTeX macros to wiki, i.e., using the full LaTeX system under wiki.

Uhm... both sound nearly the same. Either way, I did some searching, but haven't gotten around to test either solutions that I've encountered:

Convert LaTeX (and others) to wiki (and others) - Pandoc - by the description in its page, looks to me to be the most promising possibility;
Online and perl script, for basic convertion from LaTeX to wiki - Latex-to-Wiki-converter - this one is pretty basic, but is downloadable and is a single script :)
Plugin for openfoamwiki - Mediawiki and LaTeX - this would have to be installed in openfoamwiki.net, and might only work for some things, namely equations.

And Thank you for the solver know-how you've shared :)

In the mean time, I'm still hanging on to the idea of linking up openfoamwiki.net with -extend's SVN in sourceforge... i.e., putting the LaTeX PDF/PS (and even source) versions in the SVN, and making a link to them in the respective solver page in the wiki ;)

Best regards,
Bruno

alberto

March 16, 2010 21:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by wyldckat (Post 250334)

Hi Alberto,

I've seen you're other thread about these same guides, but only just recently saw this thread...

Yes, I'm very sorry for the duplicate post. I did not know this thread required moderation to start a new thread, and I simply thought my message would have not been accepted because I posted it in the wrong place, so I opened the other thread. Sorry about that.

Quote:

Plugin for openfoamwiki - Mediawiki and LaTeX - this would have to be installed in openfoamwiki.net, and might only work for some things, namely equations.

Thanks for the tips. The wiki supports LaTeX equations already. The major problem are references, sectioning, command definition and so on, but with soma patience it can be done :cool:

Quote:

And Thank you for the solver know-how you've shared :)

You're welcome.

Quote:

In the mean time, I'm still hanging on to the idea of linking up openfoamwiki.net with -extend's SVN in sourceforge... i.e., putting the LaTeX PDF/PS (and even source) versions in the SVN, and making a link to them in the respective solver page in the wiki ;)

This does not depend on me, and you already know that.:D

Best,

christian_gross

March 25, 2010 03:56

Thanks for the guides. They are much appreciated.

piprus

March 28, 2010 07:25

First of all, thanks for this contribution. It's a really great job!

One question concerning:

Quote:

Originally Posted by alberto (Post 247302)

More will come in some time,

Can I expect such guide for compressibleInterFoam solver in near future?

alberto

March 28, 2010 20:56

Hello,

that solver is not among those I considered to document. Hopefully someone else will contribute the documentation for it, or you could write it if you decide to study how it works.

Best,

piprus

April 3, 2010 11:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by alberto (Post 252065)

Hello,

that solver is not among those I considered to document. Hopefully someone else will contribute the documentation for it, or you could write it if you decide to study how it works.

Best,

Thanks for your replay, sorry to read it unfortunately, but maybe something will come up due to another thread. Who knows maybe new solver guide :)

alberto

April 3, 2010 13:29

That would be nice :-)

wouter

January 27, 2011 05:29

typo, bug or not understood

Hello Alberto,

Thanks for the many contribution to this forum. I was reading the code in the wiki page on bubblefoam and in Ueqns.H I came across:
UbEqn = ... Cvm*rhob*alpha/rhob .... should this not be:
... Cvm*rhoa*alpha/rhob ... ?
I found in OF-1.7.0 of CAElinux that this statement is also in twoPhaseEulerFoam, same .H file?

Best regards
Wouter

alberto

January 27, 2011 12:49

I think it is correct as it is, the virtual mass force is given by

Cvm * rho_continuous_phase * ...

in the literature.

wouter

January 27, 2011 14:52

Thanks,

I assume I am wrong again if I say that rhob can be removed then altogether?
:o

best regards
Wouter

alberto

January 27, 2011 15:17

You are actually right. I think they left to make the code readable, or because they cut and paste Ua, and replaced ;-)

chenxizh

February 16, 2012 20:44

hi alberto , I am reading the bubblefoam guides it is very usefull, i thingk there is a mistake in governing equtation of momenton , the Reynolds stress tensor term shuold not have the density rou?

Quote:

Originally Posted by alberto (Post 247302)

Hi,

a few days ago I updated the following guides on the wiki, for those interested:

scalarTransportFoam: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/ScalarTransportFoam
bubbleFoam: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/BubbleFoam

alberto

February 17, 2012 00:05

Hi and thanks for the comment.

I don't think the density should appear, since it is assumed to be constant, and the momentum equation is divided by the phase density (note that the kinematic viscosity is used).

Best,

chenxizh

February 17, 2012 00:21

hi, I mean that in section 3.2 the third and fourth term in momentum eqution is obvious not dimemsion balance ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by alberto (Post 344866)

alberto

February 17, 2012 00:33

Thanks. I fixed it :-)

chenxizh

March 28, 2012 11:36

Hi alberto, recently I run the tutorial bed2(the bubble bed) used twoPhaseEulerFoam, I found that the max volume fraction of the solid will larger than the alphaMax, the alphaMax is 0.62 and alpha actually can reach 0.73? I've turned on the PackingLimter . So what is the problem? can you give me some suggestion? Thank you.
chen

Quote:

Originally Posted by alberto (Post 344870)

Thanks. I fixed it :-)

alberto

March 28, 2012 14:30

Hi, that's an issue on how the particle pressure is managed if you use the kinetic theory. If you take a look at the code, it is treated explicitly.

As discussed elsewhere, I proposed a fix to this problem, but it's not released yet.

chenxizh

March 28, 2012 20:29

So do you mean that in this version(2.1.0), the foam cannot avoid this problem ? I used Gidsaspow's radial function, the solid pressure will be large when alpha approach the alphaMax to avoid the problem in physcially. So can you give me a hint about how you fix the problem. Thanks a lot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by alberto (Post 351997)

alberto

March 28, 2012 21:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by chenxizh (Post 352045)

The code is implemented correctly, and, if you use a small-enough time step, it should indeed work. However its stability is not strong.

The typical approach to enforce the packing limit is to:

Remove the singularity in the particle pressure. One way is to use CarnahanStarling radial distribution function (btw, Gidaspow's radial distribution is not correct, since it is not 1 when alpha is zero. The correct version of that formulation for g0 is the one of Sinclair and Jackson).
Use a continuous function to manage the dense (frictional) limit. In such limit, the kinetic theory is not applicable anyways, because collisions are not binary anymore, and there is sustained contact among particles.
Include the effect of the particle pressure into the equation for alpha. OpenFOAM does this if the "ppMagf" model is used. Note that ppMagf is the "elastic modulus" of the phase, which is nothing but the derivative d(pa)/d(alpha), being pa the particle pressure. The same approach can be extended to manage packing limit with the kinetic theory model.

What kind of problems do you need to solve? I could try to merge some of the developments I have in my code into twoPhaseEulerFoam, and release them. After all, they are all written in my paper :D

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41.

Page 1 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page