|August 8, 2013, 04:19||
Different Mesh quality using ParaView-4.0.1 and ParaView-3.12.
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 76Rep Power: 4
I am learning, how to use snappyHexMesh using Porsche-model.
After running SnappyHexMesh i opened the same case using #ParaView-4.0.1-Linux-64bit# and #ParaView-3.12.0-64bit#
And i got 2 different type of meshing
Right picture : using ParaView-4.0.1-Linux-64bit
Left picture : using ParaView-3.12.0-64bit
Why ? and How ? I am really confused !
Thanks a lot !!
|August 8, 2013, 04:41||
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posts: 921Rep Power: 17
I'm guessing snappyhexmesh has the castellated mesh and the snapped mesh in different time steps, and you are not looking at the same timestep in those screenshots.
*On twitter @akidTwit
*Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer.
*Help define the OpenFOAM stackexchange Q&A site: http://area51.stackexchange.com/prop...oam-technology
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Paraview 3.98.0 does not update list of mesh regions||letzel||OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam||5||September 29, 2015 05:47|
|gmshToFoam problem: not the same mesh in Gmsh vs. paraview||zhernadi||Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ...||8||July 7, 2011 02:28|
|ParaView shows blocky mesh||lfbarcelo||OpenFOAM||3||June 25, 2010 08:16|
|external flow with snappyHexMesh||chelvistero||OpenFOAM||11||January 15, 2010 20:43|
|paraFoam reader for OpenFOAM 1.6||smart||OpenFOAM Installation||13||November 16, 2009 22:41|