CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Post-Processing

simpleFoam vs buoyantSimpleFoam

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 3, 2014, 12:13
Default simpleFoam vs buoyantSimpleFoam
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4
openFUser is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers,

I am quite new to use OF to solve external aerodynamics. I am writing here to ask for your kind help.
I try to simulate a cube placed on the ground on a face in order to understand how OF manage the force calculation with simpleFoam and with buoyantSimpleFoam.
The point is that I should get the same value of forces on the cube, but something is wrong...
I tried to compare the data in the postProcessing/forces folder with the value obtained by the integral of pressure on the cube's surfaces in paraFoam but i cant get the point.
Maybe I make some mistakes: to integrate pressure on faces I generate surface normals on the cube and the integrate the calculated variable p*normals.

The topics are these:
1. there is any differences on forceCalculation between simple and buoyant?
2. why the intergals of (p*normals) do not match with the force calculation of postProcessing folder?

I'd like to thank anyone could help me...

Here below there some values:

/*___with simpleFoam___*/

pressure 0;
dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];

--> after 50k iter

forces(pressure, viscous, porous)
(-1.677823966 -0.04192667675 0.8973219913) only pressure

while with the integrateVariable on P
1.47393 -0.0309424 -0.895828


pressure 101325;
dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0];

pressure 100000;
dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0];

--> after 50k iter
forces(pressure, viscous, porous)
(-3.544135454 -0.2622319888 -24650.00027) only pressure

while with the integrateVariable on P_rgh
193.717 421.979 26073.8

while with the integrateVariable on P
193.71 421.967 26072.3
openFUser is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simpleFoam parallel AndrewMortimer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 August 7, 2015 18:45
Laminar simpleFoam and inviscid simpleFoam herenger OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 July 11, 2013 06:27
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison DanM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 January 5, 2013 07:21
Trying to run a benchmark case with simpleFoam spsb OpenFOAM 3 February 24, 2012 10:07
Naca0012 k-e mpirun gives fpe whereas simpleFoam not Pierpaolo OpenFOAM 1 May 8, 2010 03:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37.