CFD Online Discussion Forums (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM Pre-Processing (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-pre-processing/)
-   -   checkMesh errors (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-pre-processing/106688-checkmesh-errors.html)

 Tobi September 5, 2012 11:06

checkMesh errors

Hi all,

i normally check my mesh with checkMesh.
In my present mesh there are no errors by using the standard version. But if i add some arguments like -allGeometry, -allTopologys I ll get errors.

So the question is. Are these errors critical?

- allGeometry
Code:

```  *There are 350 faces with concave angles between consecutive edges. Max concave angle = 68.2256 degrees.   <<Writing 350 faces with concave angles to set concaveFaces     Face flatness (1 = flat, 0 = butterfly) : average = 0.997966  min = 0.458419   *There are 19 faces with ratio between projected and actual area < 0.8     Minimum ratio (minimum flatness, maximum warpage) = 0.458419   <<Writing 19 warped faces to set warpedFaces     Cell determinant (wellposedness) : minimum: 0.035225 average: 13.0762     Cell determinant check OK.  ***Concave cells (using face planes) found, number of cells: 8259   <<Writing 8259 concave cells to set concaveCells```
-allTopology
Code:

```Checking topology...     Boundary definition OK.     Cell to face addressing OK.     Point usage OK.     Upper triangular ordering OK.     Face vertices OK.     Topological cell zip-up check OK.   <<Number of duplicate (not baffle) faces found: 1. This might indicate a problem.   <<Number of faces with non-consecutive shared points: 1. This might indicate a problem.   <<Writing 3 faces with non-standard edge connectivity to set edgeFaces     Number of regions: 1 (OK).```
I know that *** errors are critical. I wrote out those cells and loaded the files into paraview.
the concave cells are good cells ?!? I am a bit confused with that output.

For answers and solutions I ll be very thankful couse in my solver one scalar is running away all the time :/
Tobi

 wyldckat September 8, 2012 15:01

Hi Tobi,

I personally always have trouble memorizing what concave means :rolleyes: But that's what wikipedia is for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concave

Therefore, concave cells are baaaaad. ;)

If you converted the cellSet using foamToVTK, you should have used the option "-poly", so it will export using polyhedral meshes, instead of decomposing those cells into tetrahedral cells.

As for fixing these cells... refining only them might fix the problem... either that, or create the mesh again, with better quality parameters ;)

Best regards,
Bruno

 Tobi September 10, 2012 06:57

Quote:
 Originally Posted by wyldckat (Post 380886) Hi Tobi, I personally always have trouble memorizing what concave means :rolleyes: But that's what wikipedia is for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concave Therefore, concave cells are baaaaad. ;) If you converted the cellSet using foamToVTK, you should have used the option "-poly", so it will export using polyhedral meshes, instead of decomposing those cells into tetrahedral cells. As for fixing these cells... refining only them might fix the problem... either that, or create the mesh again, with better quality parameters ;) Best regards, Bruno
Hi Bruno,

thanks for your replay.
With setSet I filtered the concave cells to a VTK format and had a look at those cells. These cells are on the curvature of my sphere and they seem like to be good. Hmmm ...

well I ll try your suggestions.
The quality parameters are the standard settings in snappyHexMesh and I think that these parameters standing for high resolution, arent they?

Thanks tobi

 Tobi September 10, 2012 07:25

1 Attachment(s)
Hi Bruno

I had a look to that cells again (screenshot).
There you can see my concave cells - but they are just normal hexaedral cells ? ? ?

Not like the one in your link.
I am confused?

Any suggestions?

 Tobi September 10, 2012 08:43

Hi Bruno,

Eugene mentioned that concave cells are not a big problem :)

Tobi

 shipman January 24, 2014 12:18

hi

Hi Tobi,

I have same error as same as you as follows. Could you tell me what is your observation about concave error? Can it to be corrected? or what i should do to solve this problem. bcs it gives also error during running of calculation.

Code:

```Mesh stats     points:          654382     faces:            1596014     internal faces:  1412748     cells:            471322     boundary patches: 3     point zones:      0     face zones:      0     cell zones:      0 Overall number of cells of each type:     hexahedra:    410213     prisms:        0     wedges:        0     pyramids:      0     tet wedges:    0     tetrahedra:    0     polyhedra:    61109 Checking topology...     Boundary definition OK.     Cell to face addressing OK.     Point usage OK.     Upper triangular ordering OK.     Face vertices OK.     Topological cell zip-up check OK.     Face-face connectivity OK.     Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces ...     Patch              Faces    Points  Surface topology                  Bounding box     wall                182766  183793  ok (non-closed singly connected)  (-0.006 -0.008 -2.71051e-20) (0.00194 0.007 0.00194)     outlet              100      121      ok (non-closed singly connected)  (0 -0.008 0) (0.00194 -0.008 0.00194)     inlet              400      451      ok (non-closed singly connected)  (-0.006 0.007 0) (0.00194 0.007 0.00194) Checking geometry...     Overall domain bounding box (-0.006 -0.008 -2.71051e-20) (0.00194 0.007 0.00194)     Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1)     Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1)     Boundary openness (2.22526e-14 -1.42534e-17 -2.50737e-15) OK.     Max cell openness = 2.06795e-16 OK.     Max aspect ratio = 2.5 OK.     Minumum face area = 3.75e-11. Maximum face area = 1.6e-07.  Face area magnitudes OK.     Min volume = 7.03125e-16. Max volume = 6.4e-11.  Total volume = 1.37934e-07.  Cell volumes OK.     Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 29.0546 average: 10.3431     Non-orthogonality check OK.     Face pyramids OK.     Max skewness = 1.6129 OK.     Coupled point location match (average 0) OK.     Face tets OK.     Min/max edge length = 5e-06 0.0004 OK.     All angles in faces OK.     Face flatness (1 = flat, 0 = butterfly) : average = 1  min = 1     All face flatness OK.     Cell determinant (wellposedness) : minimum: 0.821136 average: 13.565     Cell determinant check OK.  ***Concave cells (using face planes) found, number of cells: 58628   <<Writing 58628 concave cells to set concaveCells Failed 1 mesh checks.```

 wyldckat January 24, 2014 19:03

Greetings to all!

@George: I'll try to answer you on this topic at your other thread: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...oam-error.html

Best regards,
Bruno

 All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:28.