CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

rhoCentralFoam low Ma

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 20, 2013, 15:48
Default rhoCentralFoam low Ma
  #1
Member
 
Vasileios Sassanis
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 4
VSass is on a distinguished road
Hey lads,

i'm trying to simulate a flow of U=0.01m/s around a sphere (Re=183). I've already done this with icoFoam and now i'm trying to get the same results using rhoCentralFoam, but the problem do not seem to converge.

I've read somewhere that this solver needs preconditioning in order to solve for low Ma speeds. Is that why i don't get a similar,converged solution like the one in icoFoam?

Thanks
VSass is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 3, 2015, 09:41
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 278
Rep Power: 4
chriss85 is on a distinguished road
Sorry for the late reply, just thought I might add something.

Generally, density based solvers like rhoCentralFoam are not suited for very low Mach number flows, like you appear to have. It's better suited for transsonic/supersonic scenarios. For subsonic cases pressure based solvers are more reliable.

However, I too would like to know up to which lower Mach value the rhoCentralFoam solver is deemed suitable.
chriss85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 5, 2015, 00:33
Default
  #3
Member
 
Ashwani
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 3
AshwaniAssam is on a distinguished road
rhoCentralFoam being a density based solver can not be directly used for low mach number as mentioned by Chriss. The solver does not have preconditioning or other low-mach number technique.

I am not sure much about the limit but it could be above M =0.3 . Also, You should not be even getting an accurate solution. Are you getting correct result?
AshwaniAssam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 6, 2015, 03:50
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 278
Rep Power: 4
chriss85 is on a distinguished road
Do you happen to have some literature regarding preconditioning techniques or other concepts for low Mach numbers in density based solvers?

I'm solving a transient problem in which I can get quite different speeds and Mach numbers (large range of temperatures, and so I also get very different speeds of sounds). I'm not really sure which solver would be best for this. Right now I've based my code on sonicFoam, but sonicFoam is known to perform badly on transsonic/supersonic speeds compared to rhoCentralFoam.
chriss85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 6, 2015, 13:01
Default
  #5
Member
 
Ashwani
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 3
AshwaniAssam is on a distinguished road
Did you tried sonicFoam for subsonic cases. It is a pressure-based alogo, it should be working fine. For Preconditioning you can see Blazek CFD book, or just google weiss preconditioning.
AshwaniAssam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2015, 03:59
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 278
Rep Power: 4
chriss85 is on a distinguished road
Yes I'm currently using a solver based on sonicFoam. I just want to make sure it's the optimal choice for me
chriss85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
low mach, rhocentralfoam

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low Reynolds Number SST Model Josh CFX 39 February 19, 2014 09:47
Turbulence model for low Reynolds number flow? Nokadu Main CFD Forum 3 May 26, 2013 11:42
Low Pressure, Low Temperature Luke CFX 0 August 4, 2006 18:36
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12
CFD code for very low Re Flow Raj Main CFD Forum 2 May 31, 1999 22:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12.