|
[Sponsors] |
i have a doubt about mag(U) and mag(internalField(U)) in their results |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 13, 2013, 05:20 |
i have a doubt about mag(U) and mag(internalField(U)) in their results
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26 |
im concluding that in the concept of mag(U) that is defined in for example p folder it uses velocity on the patch and in mag(internalField(U)) it uses magnitude of internal value(neighboring cell),right?
Then When we have defined U as mag(internalField(U)) both should be the same? Am i correct or not? Last edited by immortality; April 17, 2013 at 19:38. |
|
April 14, 2013, 09:45 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26 |
am i correct?
|
|
April 16, 2013, 17:34 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26 |
any answer?
|
|
April 20, 2013, 13:31 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26 |
I mean when we define p as a function of U in 0/p does the solver understands that it should first calculate U(that may be a function of anything) at first and then use that in p equation?
I've tested and am using it and results correctly. but I'm wondering how does solver knows the arrangement? why it doesn't go to p folder at first and don't give an error of not have a value on the patch? does it related to the order that solver uses to calculate fields? but I examined a reversed process(U a function of p) without any problem in BC.it's very good but why and how?or I'm speaking on a banal concept? |
|
|
|