CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

Umean and U

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 13, 2013, 19:49
Default Umean and U
  #1
Member
 
yu
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 6
xiyuqiu is on a distinguished road
Hello All,

Does anyone know what is the difference between Umean and U from the flow field when running turbulent model? I first thought Umean is the mean velocity and U is the instantaneous velocity, but I do not see any random fluctuations with U. Can someone help? Thanks.
xiyuqiu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2013, 15:22
Default
  #2
ngj
Senior Member
 
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,619
Rep Power: 25
ngj will become famous soon enoughngj will become famous soon enough
Hi Yu,

You would need to tell, which solver you are using, and which OF version you are using in order to except answers to your questions.

You would also need to tell, whether you are using RANS, LES or laminar turbulence model in your simulations.

Kind regards

Niels
ngj is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2013, 13:09
Default
  #3
Member
 
yu
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 6
xiyuqiu is on a distinguished road
Hello Niels,

Thanks for the reply.

I am using k-epsilon and k-omega model, simpleFoam solver, OpenFoam 2.0.1. Sorry about not being clear about it.

best,

yu
xiyuqiu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2013, 03:34
Default
  #4
ngj
Senior Member
 
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,619
Rep Power: 25
ngj will become famous soon enoughngj will become famous soon enough
Hi Yu,

It sounds a bit weird, because simpleFoam is a steady state solver, so I do not know, where you get the Umean field from.
I looked in simpleFoam and the incompressible RAS turbulence models, and I could not find the definition of the Umean field.

Secondly, a steady state solver does not have information on the turbulent fluctuations.

Kind regards

Niels
ngj is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2013, 13:05
Default
  #5
Member
 
yu
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 6
xiyuqiu is on a distinguished road
Hello Niels,

Thank you for your input. When I finish my openFoam run, in the result folder 3000 (I let it run for 3000 iterations), there are Umean and U files in it. When I plot them in paraView, they are clearly different for some case, close for some other case. Also, when I run buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam, which suppose to be a steady solver as well, I see my Umean and U velocity fields clearly been different. I will try to post pictures in the next two messages
xiyuqiu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2013, 13:16
Default
  #6
Member
 
yu
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 6
xiyuqiu is on a distinguished road
Umean_pic.png

U_pic.png
xiyuqiu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2013, 19:19
Default
  #7
ngj
Senior Member
 
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,619
Rep Power: 25
ngj will become famous soon enoughngj will become famous soon enough
Do you perform any runTime processing in your controlDict? To me it sounds like an averaging procedure is activated.

Are your simulation converged?

Kind regards

Niels
ngj is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2013, 00:49
Default
  #8
Member
 
yu
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 6
xiyuqiu is on a distinguished road
yes. i think there is a runTime processing in my controlDict. I thought it is some kind of sudo-steady simulation i.e. it is a steady simulation, but the run time is just a way to define the number of time steps needs to run. You are also correct about the residuals are not converging for the pipe case I showed here. However, what is shown here is the buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam heat transfer case. When I run simpleFoam solver, the case is converging and I got both Umean and U and they are different as well.
xiyuqiu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2013, 04:11
Default
  #9
ngj
Senior Member
 
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,619
Rep Power: 25
ngj will become famous soon enoughngj will become famous soon enough
Of course the two fields will be different, since you are averaging a lot of non-equal fields and comparing with the final time step.

In my perspective Umean does not make sense for a steady state simulation.

Kind regards

Niels
ngj is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 19, 2013, 18:55
Default
  #10
Member
 
yu
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 6
xiyuqiu is on a distinguished road
So you think the Umean is the averaging between the time step? And the U velocity in the results is the mean turbulent flow velocity?
xiyuqiu is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whatbs the meaning of variables in the computed results yfjma OpenFOAM Post-Processing 8 November 12, 2012 02:52
Access UMean at runtime deji OpenFOAM 2 March 19, 2012 13:10
Error in channelOodles tutorial alberto OpenFOAM Bugs 62 June 8, 2010 07:13
postChannel bug zebu83 OpenFOAM Bugs 9 November 23, 2009 03:46
Umean balakrishnan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 March 11, 2005 12:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:24.