 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
April 19, 2006, 08:03
|
I need to treat buoyancy term
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Maka Mohu
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 305
Rep Power: 7  |
I need to treat buoyancy term (beta*alpha*(T-T0)) on momentum equation with a second order scheme. I looked at fvSchemes dictionary and I could not find label that treat terms with no derivative. I notice that once I change that momentum equation and do some adjustment, the code run well. My question: how did the code treat the buoyancy term? Can I treat in second-order way (Adams-Bashforth for example)? Thanks.
best regards, Maka |
|
|
|
|
|
April 20, 2006, 07:42
|
refers to OpenFOAM V 1.2
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Maka Mohu
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 305
Rep Power: 7 |
refers to OpenFOAM V 1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Implicit or explicit treatment of convective terms | CH | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 14, 2007 08:51 |
| [Q] Convection term treatment in UDS | Ryan, Lee | FLUENT | 4 | October 18, 2004 10:20 |
| Problem Buoyancy Term | Andreas | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 4, 2004 00:35 |
| transient term treatment | Mike | Main CFD Forum | 9 | February 18, 2003 13:26 |
| Treatment of Source Term in CE/SE | shinehwa | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 6, 2002 21:38 |
Linear Mode
