CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

nutWallFunction boundary condition

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 26, 2009, 11:19
Lightbulb nutWallFunction boundary condition
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 7
AirS is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
I use a turbulence model (RANS) and I need you for one thing:
I know that "nut" is calculated by the formula nut=C*k^2/epsilon where C=0.09.
I've seen over some tutorials:
" type nutWallFunction;
value uniform 0;
"
and my problem is here, why does the value set to 0 ? Indeed, nut is not equal to 0 near the wall if we consider the formula above.
Could somebody explain that to me ?
thank you in advance
AirS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2009, 16:37
Default
  #2
Member
 
Paulo Alexandre Costa Rocha
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 8
paulo is on a distinguished road
Dear AirS,

I think nut goes to zero when the turbulence kinetic energy (k) goes, based on the zero velocity on the wall.

Best Regards,

Paulo
paulo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2009, 07:10
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 7
AirS is on a distinguished road
Thanks for answering but I'm sorry to not understand:

the turbulent kinetic energy near the wall is modelled by the kqRWallFunction and its value is set to uniform but it's not equal to zero, it's even equal to the intial condition that I could compute before (cf. tutorials)
So, is that correct if I say that NEAR the wall the turbulent kinetic is not equal to zero on account of the model but that ON the wall it's fixed to zero by the condition "value uniform 0" ?? it doesn't make sense but I don't know what it could be otherwise.

Hope you can help me guys to sort this out.
Thanks!
AirS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 22, 2010, 10:49
Question nutWallFunction or calculated nut
  #4
Senior Member
 
maddalena's Avatar
 
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 12
maddalena is on a distinguished road
Hi FOAMers,
this seems the good thread for posting a question that have been turning round into my mind for a couple of days now.
I am wandering what is the difference in using nutWallFunction or a
{
type calculated;
value uniform 0;
}

condition for nut if k and epsilon are defined as kQRWallFunction and epsilonWallFunction in the same boundaries. The only explanation I see is that:
  • if nutWallFunction is applied, than a specific wall function is used, depending from the y+ value. y+ is taken as an output parameter and can be obtained using yPlusRAS.
  • if a uniform 0 condition is used, then a standard wall function is used, y+ is internally calculated and cannot obtained as output.
Am I right? And what is the phisical meaning of that?

Thanks a lot to those that will shed some light.

Maddalena
maddalena is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2010, 08:56
Thumbs down ??
  #5
Senior Member
 
Sandy Lee
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 207
Rep Power: 9
sandy is on a distinguished road
Then, what is the conclusion? ...

Who can give light?
sandy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2010, 07:28
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 12
eugene is on a distinguished road
The

value uniform 0;

entry is simply a placeholder for that gets filled with the correct value of nut by the code once you run it. To be clear, the initial value of nutw = 0 has no effect on the solution, it is where the result of calculating nutw will get written in the result fields. It is not an input field in the normal sense of the word, but rather an output field that just needs to be there in the beginning because of the way the code is written.
eugene is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2010, 08:31
Lightbulb Light!
  #7
Senior Member
 
maddalena's Avatar
 
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 12
maddalena is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandy View Post
Then, what is the conclusion? ...

Who can give light?

Hello Sandy,
besides Eugene's explanations, you can find some more information about the question I posted above on this thread: low reynolds re turbulence boundary and yPlus values.
Hope this help.

maddalena
maddalena is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boundary Conditions Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 20 July 7, 2013 05:05
Axis Boundary Condition..what is it? CFDtoy FLUENT 6 February 13, 2007 06:51
How to set boundary condition in Fluent for the fo Peiyong FLUENT 1 November 10, 2006 12:44
1 and 2 Order Boundary condition at the same place CFD_Flo Main CFD Forum 4 July 11, 2005 11:57
How to resolve boundary condition problem? sam FLUENT 2 July 20, 2003 02:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:18.