|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posts: 751
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
I have a coupled solver that ensures the use of a mixed boundary condition at a specific patch as:
Code:
field().boundaryField()[bPatchID()].type()
== mixedFvPatchField<scalar>::typeName
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. *Check out the scientific computing exchange http://scicomp.stackexchange.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posts: 751
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
I think I found my answer: isA<mixedFvPatchScalarField>(field().boundaryField ()[bPatchID()])
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. *Check out the scientific computing exchange http://scicomp.stackexchange.com |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| non reflective boundary conditions for incompresible flow | Pascal_doran | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 11 | April 1, 2013 20:56 |
| Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 24 | January 11, 2012 13:40 |
| CFX13 Post Periodic interface | EtaEta | CFX | 7 | December 8, 2011 17:15 |
| Force can not converge | colopolo | CFX | 13 | October 4, 2011 22:03 |
| Fluent accuracy and boundary conditions | Paolo Lampitella | FLUENT | 0 | June 12, 2008 06:25 |