CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

LES with Simple Algorithm for steady situations

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By atmcfd
  • 1 Post By JimKnopf

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 24, 2013, 10:31
Default LES with Simple Algorithm for steady situations
  #1
Senior Member
 
Bobi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 5
babakflame is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers
Hi

I have a question about LES. Can we have a LES solution with Simple Algorithm rather than Pimple. I mean if we use a steady algorithm like Simple for a steady problem like a free jet, Is it possible or even right?

Regards
Bobi
babakflame is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2013, 15:12
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
atmcfd's Avatar
 
ATM
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 8
atmcfd is on a distinguished road
No. LES is for solving turbulence problems, which are inherently Unsteady. Therefore you should not use a steady solver for these cases. You have to run the unsteady case for a certain time period, and then average the instantaneous solutions to obtain the turbulent flow statistics.
babakflame likes this.
atmcfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 02:22
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Bobi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 5
babakflame is on a distinguished road
Dear ATM
Hi
with your response I conclude that LES is not applicable with Simple algorithm and always I should employ the Pimple one. Nevertheless, RAS models can use Simple algorithm although they characterize turbulent flows. They average the solutions during marching to find the favre solution. My intension was that can we use the same strategy for LES? I mean instead of having real time marching in Pimple algorithms, employing unreal marching in Simple solvers and then averaging the instantaneous solutions to find the ultimate solution. As we can do in RAS model.

Regards
Bobi
babakflame is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 02:35
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
atmcfd's Avatar
 
ATM
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 8
atmcfd is on a distinguished road
Bobi,

You are right about RAS., and LES runs on a modified SIMPLE method. However, in LES you are resolving much smaller length scales than you do in RAS. Hence time stepping is very important as it should be very small. Since you resolve very small scales , their associated time scales are very small too. So, to obtain good statistics, you have to have a sufficiently small timestep. A courant no. of <0.5 is usually recommended.

Therefore, even pimpleFoam would not be a good choice since its a "Large time-step transient solver for incompressible flow using the PIMPLE (merged PISO-SIMPLE) algorithm" (OF website)

My best bet would be in dedicated transient solvers like pisoFoam, channelFoam etc. for LES.A Steady State solver is unphysical for LES.

Last edited by atmcfd; March 19, 2013 at 10:53. Reason: edit
atmcfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 03:26
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Bobi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 5
babakflame is on a distinguished road
Dear ATM
Hi
Thnks for ur suggestions buddy.

Regards
Bobi
babakflame is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2013, 16:46
Default
  #6
Member
 
Jim Knopf
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 6
JimKnopf is on a distinguished road
This is not a question of piso, simple or pimple, which names the way the pressure coupling is done, but more a question of spartial and time resolution.

Afaik you can use SIMPLE als pressure coupling for solving Equations with a time derivative.

But if you are using LES - which means Large Eddy Simulation - you have to bear in mind that you have to resolve these large eddies. Afaik they are commonly the eddy with a length scale above the isotropic ones (but I'm not sure if this is a correct formulation). Also you have to bear in mind that a lenght scale is coupled with a time scale via the velocity. The CFL-criterium gives the time step size if you know length and velocity scales, is has to be 1 for the smalest eddies.

In RANS or RAS you think of turbulence as of a viscosity, whicht provides you with the energie dissipation you get in LES via the breakup of eddies. If you use a to coarse mesh or a to large time step size, it does not mean you get divergence or no result. It does only mean you get a not correct result, what ever correct is. LES is not a easy to use tool.

Greets
Jim
JimKnopf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2013, 03:11
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Bobi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 5
babakflame is on a distinguished road
Dear jim
Hi

Thnks for your suggestions. My question is not about time steps or grid sizes, cause as u know there are some limitations for LES. As Pope has mentioned in his book, For instance LES should resolve about 80% of the turbulent kinetic energy. I was wondering that if we had a steady turbulence condition, can we use SIMPLE algorithm for coupling between pressure and velocity in conjunction with LES turbulence model.
Regards
Bobi
babakflame is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2013, 12:58
Default
  #8
Member
 
Jim Knopf
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 6
JimKnopf is on a distinguished road
Hi Bobi,

but steady or unsteady is not a question of pressure coupling, it's a question of the Equations you're solving. What I mean is that you can't infer from SIMPLE that it's steady, without time resolution. You are right that most (all?) of the esi/OF delivered solvers with SIMPLE algorithm are steady solvers but there are enough unsteady solvers with SIMPLE pressure coupling.

And definetly you are right with saying that LES and steady does not work or say does not bring meaningful results.

Regards,
Jim
babakflame likes this.
JimKnopf is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SIMPLE algorithm confusion lost.identity Main CFD Forum 1 October 7, 2010 11:48
LES basic and simple questions. dshawul Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2010 10:56
What is advantage of SIMPLE algorithm? Geon-Hong Main CFD Forum 1 May 18, 2010 07:46
SIMPLE algorithm for variable density flow mauz Main CFD Forum 1 May 15, 2009 15:13
SIMPLE algorithm Jonathan Castro Main CFD Forum 3 December 10, 1999 05:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:10.