[mcdonalds]

Dear openFoamers,


I'd like to add an implicit source term to my pde. It would look like this:

        solve
            (
                Foam::fvm::laplacian(sigmaeff, phi) == -iagCell*((Foam::exp(alphaaa*F*(phiao-phi-EaEqgCell)/(Rg*T)))-(Foam::exp(-alphaca*F*(phiao-phi-EaEqgCell)/(Rg*T)))) 
            );

Where phi is my volscalarfield (Notice phi is on both sides of the equation). Other variables are independent or constant.

I looked at OpenFoam documentation, specifically from this site:
http://www.foamcfd.org/Nabla/guides/...sGuidese9.html

And it talks about using Su, Sp, and SuSp. I would like to use those things but I'm not sure how to. In the documentation it talks about a rho and phi, where rho can either be a dimensioned scalar or a volscalarField, and phi is the volscalarfield.

Now in my pde I do not know what rho would be.

Also, I found another link talking about this:
http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Ho...sport_equation

Any help you, the community, could provide would be great!

Sincerely,

Benjamin

[Lieven]

Hi Benjamin,

If you do a incompressible simulation, rho is simply 1.0.
Now, regarding your source term. The fact that it is inside the exponential function makes it impossible to included implicitly. This is only possible for linear systems. The closest you will probably get is something like

fvm::Sp(exp(...)/phi,phi)

but I don't know how much effect this will have... It's certainly not fully explicit.

Cheers,

L

[mcdonalds]

Dear openFoamers,

Thank you for your response, Lieven. I suppose I cannot implement an implicit source term in that manner, specifically using the Foam::fvm::Sp function of openFoam.

Then I am stumped on how to implement the pde in openFoam. My equation with more clarity is attached to this file using Latex.




where phi_e is the volscalarField and all others are either constant or independent of phi.

When I put this equation into openFoam directly I get some funky results, incorrect as compared to similar simulations. Thus, I think it has to do with the phi on the right side of the equation and the equation as an implicit pde.

Any help would be really great as I feel that this is my last and final hurdle to get my simulation running smoothly.

Sincerely,

Benjamin

[henrik]

Dear Benjamin,

Yes, I am not surprised that you are having trouble with that source ... Did you try to underrelax?

fvMatrix phiEqn
(
fvm::laplacian(sigmaeff, phi) == -iagCell*((Foam::exp(alphaaa*F*(phiao-phi-EaEqgCell)/(Rg*T)))-(Foam::exp(-alphaca*F*(phiao-phi-EaEqgCell)/(Rg*T))))
);
phiEqn.relax(0.5);
phiEqn.solve();

Make sure to b build/solve multiple times!

I order to make it (more) implicit, you need to linearise your source term. There are many ways, but I suggest to use Picard's method.

http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Sourc..._linearization

Once you get through the maths, the code will look


volScalarField Sp = // derived equations
volScalarField Sc = // derived equations

fvMatrix phiEqn
(
fvm::laplacian(sigmaeff, phi) == fvm::Sp(Sp, phi) + Sc
);
phiEqn.relax(0.5);
phiEqn.solve();

Best Regards,

Henrik

[mcdonalds]

Dear openFoamers,

Thank you, Henrik, for your help. I am still trying to linearize but I have another idea.

I would like to do the following:

Etta = phiao - phi - EaEqgCell;

If Etta > .5 then Etta = .5;

Else Etta = phiao - phi -EaEqgCell;

fvMatrix phiEqn
(
fvm::laplacian(sigmaeff, phi) == -iagCell*((Foam::exp(alphaaa*F*(Etta)/(Rg*T)))-(Foam::exp(-alphaca*F*(Etta)/(Rg*T))))
);
phiEqn.relax(0.5);
phiEqn.solve();

It's the if statement I am having trouble with. How would I do that in my solver? How to create an if statement?

Sincerely,

Benjamin

[henrik]

Benjamin,

Did you try to underrelax? Did it make a difference?

Having a switch is nasty - especially if you try to linearise. Anyway, the way to do it is to use the pos and neg functions.

Alternatively, you can loop through the field cell by cell and use raw C++.

Henrik

[mcdonalds]

Dear OpenFoamers,

Hi Henrik. I did try to underrelax and it didn't make a difference, I got an error right away. I did put an if-statement in and it ran without an error. However, it leads to another problem I have.

Currently, my solver looks like this:

    Info<< "\nCalculating concentration distribution\n" << endl;

    while (simple.loop())
    {
        Info<< "Time = " << runTime.timeName() << nl << endl;



//**Add laplacians to all four species: O2, N2, H2O, H2
        while (simple.correctNonOrthogonal())
        {
       #include "diffusion.H"
    #include "partialpressure.H"
    #include "equilibriumpotential.H"
    #include "currentdensity.H"
    #include "mapToCell.H"

    #include "Etta.H"
    #include "chargedensity.H"

    #include "electricpotential.H" 

        }




    //#include "mapFromCell.H"



    
        #include "write.H"

        Info<< "ExecutionTime = " << runTime.elapsedCpuTime() << " s"
            << "  ClockTime = " << runTime.elapsedClockTime() << " s"
            << nl << endl;
    }

    Info<< "End\n" << endl;

    return 0;

The electricpotential.H file has that crazy laplaican(sigmaeff,phi) = source pde. Now the really really interesting thing is that when I look at phi directly in paraview or even after that equation, let's say between electricpotential.H and the curly bracket }, I get an everchanging phi and it seems correct. However, when I look at phi BEFORE the electricpotential.H equation, I get a phi that changes after one time step to a linear curve between its two boundary conditions and that's it. It remains steady thereafter.

Now I think there is something going on with the "solve" command that allows openFoam to be able to get the old value and put it back into the equation. It seems like outside and BEFORE the solve equation it is not reading the old values back. But AFTER the solve equation it seems to work well.

Now to my question: how do I read back the output of the solve equation, place it before my electricpotential.H file (so that I can edit it) and then place it back into my pde? In essence, I would like to see phi changing when I check on it BEFORE my solve equation of the pde. What do you, the community of openFoamers, think about this obfuscating situation?

Sincerely,

Benjamin

Originally Posted by henrik

Benjamin,

Did you try to underrelax? Did it make a difference?

Having a switch is nasty - especially if you try to linearise. Anyway, the way to do it is to use the pos and neg functions.

Alternatively, you can loop through the field cell by cell and use raw C++.

Henrik

[henrik]

Benjamin,

underrelaxation MUST change the residuals - If they do not change, you are not under-relaxing!

I am entirely sure that I understand what you are trying to do, but I will provide enough rope to you in order to hang yourself

The solve statement writes the result into field it is operating on. If you put loops into your code, the explicit terms see the new (time) values. The idea here is to iterate until the (non-linear) system of equations converges.

Of course, ddt() needs the old time values to function correctly and that's why they are stored automagically. You can retrieve them by calling .oldTime() on the field.

Henrik