U_.mesh() and mesh.
Hi guys,
Code:
alpha1_ Thanks in advance. |
Hi Sharonyue,
From the looks of it, this seems like a part of a constructor of a class. So if there is a mesh-object passed as argument with the constructor, then you can change U_.mesh() by mesh. But there probably isn't. Just ask yourself the question, why would you pass both U and mesh as arguments, when U already has a reference to the same mesh object... Cheers, Lieven |
Where is your code snippet from? Is it a default OpenFOAM piece?
Anyhow, I would guess you are just passing around pointers here, so constructing this field one way or the other does not really make a difference. |
As Lieven stated, this is part of the initialization list of a constructor. Apparently the mesh itself is not registered in this class and not passed as a parameter, either. The volVectorField U_ is of generic type GeometricField<...> and stores a reference to the mesh as a private class attribute. It can be accessed by the public mesh() member function of GeometricField<...>.
In this class itself, it is very unlikely that you can substitute U_.mesh() with mesh. Why would you like to do this? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:55. |