CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

conjugate boundary condition

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 31, 2013, 13:11
Default conjugate boundary condition
  #1
Senior Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Noshahr, Iran
Posts: 348
Rep Power: 21
Daniel_Khazaei will become famous soon enough
Hello foamers

I have a question about conjugate boundary condition at fluid-solid interface.

1) Can someone here explain the theory behind this boundary condition or point me to a proper reference regarding this type of boundary condition?

2) Also I know there is a boundary condition called "solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupled" which can be used in these situations, but for some reason I do not want to use this boundary condition in my code. Furthermore, in 1.6ext this boundary condition only works on conformal meshes. (interpolation method)

I have gone through the source code of this boundary condition, but there is a part that I do not understand:

This part in member function updateCoeffs():

Code:
    // Swap to obtain full local values of neighbour internal field
    scalarField nbrIntFld = nbrField.patchInternalField();
    mapDistribute::distribute
    (
        Pstream::defaultCommsType,
        distMap.schedule(),
        distMap.constructSize(),
        distMap.subMap(),           // what to send
        distMap.constructMap(),     // what to receive
        nbrIntFld
    );

    // Swap to obtain full local values of neighbour K*delta
    scalarField nbrKDelta = nbrField.K()*nbrPatch.deltaCoeffs();
    mapDistribute::distribute
    (
        Pstream::defaultCommsType,
        distMap.schedule(),
        distMap.constructSize(),
        distMap.subMap(),           // what to send
        distMap.constructMap(),     // what to receive
        nbrKDelta
    );
Code:
void Foam::solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupledFvPatchScalarField::updateCoeffs()
{
    if (updated())
    {
        return;
    }

    // Get the coupling information from the directMappedPatchBase
    const directMappedPatchBase& mpp = refCast<const directMappedPatchBase>
    (
        patch().patch()
    );
    const polyMesh& nbrMesh = mpp.sampleMesh();
    const fvPatch& nbrPatch = refCast<const fvMesh>
    (
        nbrMesh
    ).boundary()[mpp.samplePolyPatch().index()];

    // Force recalculation of mapping and schedule
    const mapDistribute& distMap = mpp.map();

    tmp<scalarField> intFld = patchInternalField();


    const solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupledFvPatchScalarField& nbrField =
    refCast<const solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupledFvPatchScalarField>
    (
        nbrPatch.lookupPatchField<volScalarField, scalar>
        (
            neighbourFieldName_
        )
    );

    // Swap to obtain full local values of neighbour internal field
    scalarField nbrIntFld = nbrField.patchInternalField();
    mapDistribute::distribute
    (
        Pstream::defaultCommsType,
        distMap.schedule(),
        distMap.constructSize(),
        distMap.subMap(),           // what to send
        distMap.constructMap(),     // what to receive
        nbrIntFld
    );

    // Swap to obtain full local values of neighbour K*delta
    scalarField nbrKDelta = nbrField.K()*nbrPatch.deltaCoeffs();
    mapDistribute::distribute
    (
        Pstream::defaultCommsType,
        distMap.schedule(),
        distMap.constructSize(),
        distMap.subMap(),           // what to send
        distMap.constructMap(),     // what to receive
        nbrKDelta
    );

    tmp<scalarField> myKDelta = K()*patch().deltaCoeffs();


    // Both sides agree on
    // - temperature : (myKDelta*fld + nbrKDelta*nbrFld)/(myKDelta+nbrKDelta)
    // - gradient    : (temperature-fld)*delta
    // We've got a degree of freedom in how to implement this in a mixed bc.
    // (what gradient, what fixedValue and mixing coefficient)
    // Two reasonable choices:
    // 1. specify above temperature on one side (preferentially the high side)
    //    and above gradient on the other. So this will switch between pure
    //    fixedvalue and pure fixedgradient
    // 2. specify gradient and temperature such that the equations are the
    //    same on both sides. This leads to the choice of
    //    - refGradient = zero gradient
    //    - refValue = neighbour value
    //    - mixFraction = nbrKDelta / (nbrKDelta + myKDelta())


    this->refValue() = nbrIntFld;

    this->refGrad() = 0.0;

    this->valueFraction() = nbrKDelta / (nbrKDelta + myKDelta());

    mixedFvPatchScalarField::updateCoeffs();


    if (debug)
    {
        scalar Q = gSum(K()*patch().magSf()*snGrad());

        Info<< patch().boundaryMesh().mesh().name() << ':'
            << patch().name() << ':'
            << this->dimensionedInternalField().name() << " -> "
            << nbrMesh.name() << ':'
            << nbrPatch.name() << ':'
            << this->dimensionedInternalField().name() << " :"
            << " heatFlux:" << Q
            << " walltemperature "
            << " min:" << gMin(*this)
            << " max:" << gMax(*this)
            << " avg:" << gAverage(*this)
            << endl;
    }
}

I know a way to interpolate variables (also on non-conformal meshes) in my top level code. I need to know the theory of this boundary condition, so I can do the coupling on my top level code.

Is conservation of heat flux enough in this situation? what about the temperature value at fluid-solid interface?


best wishes

regards
Daniel_Khazaei is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 06:28
Opening Boundary Condition andreachan Main CFD Forum 11 March 19, 2013 16:46
domain imbalance for enrgy equation happy CFX 14 September 6, 2012 01:54
Help with conjugate heat transfer and coupled boundary condition ravitejakatragadda FLUENT 1 March 12, 2011 07:31
asking for Boundary condition in FLUENT Destry FLUENT 0 July 27, 2010 00:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:24.