|
[Sponsors] |
Temporal discretisation of spatial derivatives in pisoFoam - Implicit or Explicit? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 29, 2014, 14:42 |
Temporal discretisation of spatial derivatives in pisoFoam - Implicit or Explicit?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Canakkale Dardanelspor
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi
==1== I have always supposed that temporal discretisation of spatial derivatives in pisoFoam is implicit. I have, however, realized that, the spatial derivatives are solved in an explicit manner if I correctly understood the following term: ==2== In the standard pisoFoam of OF version 2.2.x: Code:
solve( UEqn == -fvc::grad(p) ) I would really appreciate any comments on this. Many thanks. |
|
May 29, 2014, 15:55 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,900
Rep Power: 37 |
Hallo,
It is only the pressure gradient, which is explicit in that line of code. pisoFoam applies a segregated approach to the pressure-velocity coupling, so the pressure cannot be treated implicitly in an equation for the velocity. Kind regards, Niels
__________________
Please note that I do not use the Friend-feature, so do not be offended, if I do not accept a request. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spatial accuracy vs. Temporal accuracy | yhy20081016 | Main CFD Forum | 4 | February 20, 2014 07:42 |
Best approach to study temporal and spatial convergence | ndabir | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 16, 2013 10:46 |
Temporal and Spatial averages | shahzad_munir | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 18, 2012 06:09 |
Comparison of different spatial and temporal discretization schemes | harly | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | September 24, 2011 12:15 |
setting the 2nd order scheme in spatial and temporal discritization. | Jams | OpenFOAM | 3 | June 17, 2011 10:35 |